IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sit/wpaper/10_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Innovazione nel trasporto marittimo: inquadramento teorico e casi applicativi

Author

Listed:
  • Giulia Arduino

    (Dipartimento di Economia e Metodi Quantitativi (DIEM), Università degli Studi di Genova)

  • Claudio Ferrari

    (Dipartimento di Economia e Metodi Quantitativi (DIEM), Università degli Studi di Genova)

Abstract

Sempre più frequentemente si rilevano processi innovativi in tutti i settori del trasporto inclusa l’intermodalità. In particolare, si possono identificare diverse tipologie di innovazioni, siano esse di carattere tecnologico, organizzativo o socio-culturale. Considerando lo stato dell’arte di tali innovazioni, è evidente la mancanza di analisi di benchmarking o di altre metodologie di analisi delle innovazioni nei sistemi di trasporto. In questo paper si intende innanzi tutto identificare valutare i paths alla base dei nuovi processi innovativi in ambito marittimo-portuale, oltre alle principali determinanti, agli attori coinvolti e al loro ruolo in tali processi, ed infine quali azioni di policy sono o potrebbero essere adottate. Si procederà quindi all’analisi di alcune best practices a livello sia globale che locale per identificare e valutare le condizioni economicoorganizzative e di policy che consentono l’applicazione di concetti e processi innovativi nell’ambito del trasporto marittimo. A tal fine, saranno stabilite tipologie di variabili che determineranno le possibili path options. Esse costituiranno la base per l’identificazione di casi innovativi di successo, ma anche di quelli classificabili come “non ancora di successo”, ad esempio a seguito di barriere all’implementazione e alla trasferibilità di concetti e processi innovativi. Sarà così possibile determinare quali innovazioni possono essere ulteriormente sviluppate e quali invece sono state applicate per un tempo relativamente breve, risultando ad oggi fallimentari nel caso di sistemi innovativi di trasporto marittimo-portuale.

Suggested Citation

  • Giulia Arduino & Claudio Ferrari, 2010. "Innovazione nel trasporto marittimo: inquadramento teorico e casi applicativi," Working Papers 10_6, SIET Società Italiana di Economia dei Trasporti e della Logistica, revised 2010.
    • Handle: RePEc:sit:wpaper:10_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sietitalia.org/wpsiet/Arduino_Ferrari_SIET_2010.pdf
    File Function: First version,
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Imai, Akio & Nishimura, Etsuko & Papadimitriou, Stratos & Liu, Miaojia, 2006. "The economic viability of container mega-ships," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 21-41, January.
    2. Chris Freeman & Luc Soete, 1997. "The Economics of Industrial Innovation, 3rd Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 3, volume 1, number 0262061953, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giulia Arduino & Claudio Ferrari, 2010. "Innovazione nel trasporto marittimo: inquadramento teorico e casi applicativi," Working Papers 1006, SIET Società Italiana di Economia dei Trasporti e della Logistica, revised 2010.
    2. Foxon, T. J. & Gross, R. & Chase, A. & Howes, J. & Arnall, A. & Anderson, D., 2005. "UK innovation systems for new and renewable energy technologies: drivers, barriers and systems failures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(16), pages 2123-2137, November.
    3. Ziad Rotaba & Catherine Beaudry, 2012. "How Do High, Medium, And Low Tech Firms Innovate? A System Of Innovation (Si) Approach," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(05), pages 1-23.
    4. Cimoli, Mario & Primi, Annalisa & Rovira, Sebastián, 2011. "National innovation surveys in latin America: empirical evidence and policy implications," Documentos de Proyectos 3897, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    5. Petersen, Alexander M. & Rotolo, Daniele & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2016. "A triple helix model of medical innovation: Supply, demand, and technological capabilities in terms of Medical Subject Headings," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 666-681.
    6. José Monteiro-Barata, 2005. "Innovation in the Portuguese Manufacturing Industry: Analysis of a Longitudinal Company Panel," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 11(3), pages 301-314, August.
    7. Mark Knell & Simone Vannuccini, 2022. "Tools and concepts for understanding disruptive technological change after Schumpeter," Jena Economics Research Papers 2022-005, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    8. Jacek Wysocki, 2021. "Innovative Green Initiatives in the Manufacturing SME Sector in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    9. Jochen Streb, 1999. "How to Win Schumpeterian Competition: Technological Transfers in the German Plastics Industry from the 1930s to the 1970s," Working Papers 811, Economic Growth Center, Yale University.
    10. Jarunee Wonglimpiyarat, 2010. "Commercialization strategies of technology: lessons from Silicon Valley," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 225-236, April.
    11. Huy-Cuong Vo-Thai & Trinh-Hoang Hong-Hue & My-Linh Tran, 2021. "Technological- and Non-Technological Innovation During the Growth Phase of Industry Life Cycle: An Evidence From Vietnamese Manufacturing Enterprises," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    12. Marletto, Gerardo, 2011. "Structure, agency and change in the car regime. A review of the literature," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 47, pages 71-88.
    13. Gasperin, Simone, 2022. "Lessons from the past for 21st century systems of state-owned enterprises: The case of Italy's IRI in the 1930s," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 599-612.
    14. Andrea Vaona, 2016. "A nonparametric panel data approach to the cyclical dynamics of price-cost margins in the fourth Kondratieff wave," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 6(2), pages 155-170, August.
    15. Kalenjyan, S. (Календжян, Сергей) & Solntsev, V.I. (Солнцев, В.И.) & Vardapetyan, V.V. (Вардапетян, В.В.) & Gumilevskaya, Olga (Гумилевская, Ольга), 2016. "The Usage of Complex Strategic Planning, Management, Implementation of the Strategy, the Cluster Approach and Innovation as a Means to Improve the Effectiveness of Regional Development [On the Example," Working Papers 2863, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    16. John Britton, 2002. "Regional Implications of North American Integration: A Canadian Perspective on High Technology Manufacturing," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 359-374.
    17. Bazhal, Iurii, 2014. "Industrial policy under Neo-Schumpeterian concept of structural technological dynamics: Case of Ukraine," MPRA Paper 67434, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 24 Oct 2015.
    18. Derek Bosworth & Joanne Loundes, 2002. "The Dynamic Performance of Australian Enterprises," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2002n03, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    19. Borice Augustin Ngounou & Honoré Tekam Oumbe & Bruno Emmanuel Ongo Nkoa & Edmond Noubissi Domguia, 2024. "Inclusive growth in the face of increasing urbanization: What experience for African countries?," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 34-70, February.
    20. Nill, Jan & Kemp, Ren, 2009. "Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: From niche to paradigm?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 668-680, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sit:wpaper:10_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Edoardo Marcucci (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/siettea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.