IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/itepro/8309566.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Uncovering expectations and perceptions of the final year UG dissertation - supporting the student research journey and enhancing their graduate attributes

Author

Listed:
  • Stephany Veuger

    (Northumbria Uniuversity)

  • Samantha Gallagher

    (Queens University)

  • Hayley Creighton

    (Northumbria University)

  • Ian Robson

    (Northumbria University)

  • Lindey Cookson

    (Sunderland University)

  • Matthew Ridley

    (University of Liverpool)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to understand the experience of Applied science undergraduate (UG) project supervision. The final year UG research project has been coined the pedagogy of the 21st century. The diversity of supervisory styles is a key strength of project modules but is a source of student perceived inequality of experience in a high stakes terminal assessment. This project engaged final year UG students in a collaboration designed with inclusivity and partnership in mind. Student ?researchers? were equal partners and project evolution was led through their involvement in all aspects; study design, methods, resource development and dissemination of the outputs. The overall goal and impact of the project was to provide structure and support to dissertation students and supervisors alike by developing research informed resources that are accessible, engaging and student centred. Three themes were regularly identified; education, practical and emotional support. A key finding was that the student-supervisor relationship strongly influences student experience, satisfaction and success. However, whilst 75 % of students strongly agreed that a good student/supervisor partnership positively affects the success of the final project, only 40 % felt strongly that they had managed to build a partnership with their supervisor. The team used the emergent themes to pull together a ?making supervision work? help guide, a visual model of how the student-supervisor partnership can support the development of skills and progression towards independence. To support this further, a list of discussion points were put together by student researchers aimed at making supervision more effective without making the process a prescriptive one. The answers are personal to each supervisor/student pair but the use of a standard set of questions provides parity, clarity and structure.This project is readily scalable and we strongly believe that this strategic collaboration will see improvements in the student/staff experience of UG supervision.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephany Veuger & Samantha Gallagher & Hayley Creighton & Ian Robson & Lindey Cookson & Matthew Ridley, 2018. "Uncovering expectations and perceptions of the final year UG dissertation - supporting the student research journey and enhancing their graduate attributes," Proceedings of Teaching and Education Conferences 8309566, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:itepro:8309566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/5th-teaching-education-conference-amsterdm/table-of-content/detail?cid=83&iid=009&rid=9566
    File Function: First version, 2018
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stephany Veuger & Seth Racey, 2019. "Students as partners : on developing a student led conference to enhance the skills of UG project students," Proceedings of Teaching and Education Conferences 8410631, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Undergraduate; Research; Science; Perceptions; Expectations; Partnership; Education;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I29 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Other
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:itepro:8309566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.