IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/itepro/3906215.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

University Students Describes: How I Learned The Best?

Author

Listed:
  • Mustafa YAVUZ

    (Necmettin Erbakan University)

  • Deniz GÜLMEZ

    (Necmettin Erbakan University)

Abstract

Learning is a dynamic process. There are some factors that affect learning positively or negatively and in other words, facilitate or complicate learning. Learner, learning methods, types of issues to be learned and the learning environment are some of these factors. The purpose of this research to determine students? opinions studying at the university which course they have seen until this time how they learn best. The working group consists of totally 140 students studying in 2015-2016 academic year at Necmettin Erbakan University. The study conducted in the form of qualitative research method and data were collected by semi-structured interviews. In the form of student interviews were asked to write the lessons they have learned best and explain how they learn best. The data were analyzed by content analysis. According to findings it has found that students have learned mathematics, history, literature and Turkish lessons the best. It has revealed that they learned better via expression, problem solving and through experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Mustafa YAVUZ & Deniz GÜLMEZ, 2016. "University Students Describes: How I Learned The Best?," Proceedings of Teaching and Education Conferences 3906215, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:itepro:3906215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/3rd-teaching-education-conference-barcelona/table-of-content/detail?cid=39&iid=023&rid=6215
    File Function: First version, 2016
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Learning; learning methods; teaching methods; students.;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:itepro:3906215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.