IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iefpro/14115841.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

THE DIFFICULTIES OF SMEs : A BENCHMARK STUDY BETWEEN MOROCCO AND TURKEY

Author

Listed:
  • Lamia SABOUR ALAOUI

    (National School of Business and Management (ENCG))

Abstract

SMEs have a high rate of disappearance, an SME in the course of its life may face the risk of failure. This failure is due to several micro or macro-economic factors. The objective of this article is to address the positioning of Moroccan small and medium enterprises in relation to Turkish SMEs. As such, we have chosen Turkey, as it is among the best economic powers in the world.The comparative analysis will focus on Turkey's strengths and advantages, notably in terms of the means to solve problems and difficulties related to R&D, competition from informal enterprises, access to finance, lack of managerial and entrepreneurial skills and the capacity of SMEs to participate in the exportable offer.

Suggested Citation

  • Lamia SABOUR ALAOUI, 0000. "THE DIFFICULTIES OF SMEs : A BENCHMARK STUDY BETWEEN MOROCCO AND TURKEY," Proceedings of Economics and Finance Conferences 14115841, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iefpro:14115841
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/international-conference-on-economics-finance-and-business-prague-2023-1/table-of-content/detail?cid=141&iid=020&rid=15841
    File Function: First version, 0000
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/652 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    SMEs; Benchmarking; Managerial skills; Informal enterprises; R&D; Morocco; Turkey.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A10 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iefpro:14115841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.