IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/8711618.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Judicial Decisions on Post-divorce Child Custody?from the Perspective of Empirical Legal Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Yun-Hsien Diana LIN

    (National Tsing Hua University)

  • Daw-Wei Wang

    (National Tsing Hua University)

Abstract

The doctrine of the "best interests of the child" is the primary consideration for family court judges in making post-divorce custody decisions. However, a precise understanding of the "best interests" standard remains elusive. As Article 1055-1 of Civil Code requires judges in Taiwan to consider factors such as the age, gender, health condition and wish of the child, the character, occupation, financial condition and life style of the parents, the judge still has a wide range of discretion to reach the final decision. This article therefore aims to clarify: among the key factors, which ones take top priority in child custody decisions? Do judges in Taiwan generally favor father or mother after considering these factors? And when facts are properly gathered, is it possible to predict judicial decisions by computer algorithms?To answer the questions, over two thousands child custody cases are examined and features are labeled, then natural language processing (NLP) is employed to classify and analyze these decisions to make reliability assessments. Although this article is a work in progress, it discusses the preliminary results of an ongoing four-year research project supported by Taiwan Ministry of Technology. It is expected that with the help of NLP and descriptive statistics, the findings of this research will help to deliver a more predictable outcome for custody disputes. Moreover, the established judicial database can be a useful source toward a better understanding of judicial behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Yun-Hsien Diana LIN & Daw-Wei Wang, 2019. "Judicial Decisions on Post-divorce Child Custody?from the Perspective of Empirical Legal Studies," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 8711618, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:8711618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/iises-international-academic-conference-copenhagen/table-of-content/detail?cid=87&iid=031&rid=11618
    File Function: First version, 2019
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    best interests of the child; child custody; empirical legal studies; judicial behavior; judicial decision prediction;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:8711618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.