IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/8209052.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Copyright Crisis: The Social necessity of the Renegotiation of the TPP and the Rise of the CPTPP

Author

Listed:
  • Christina Platz

    (Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology/ RMIT University)

Abstract

Copyright law is continuously in a crisis, however, on 8 March 2018, a new initiative, the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTTP) emerged at the international level in order to aid trade related challenges such as copyright law. The CPTPP agreement was the result of an extensive renegotiation of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) that since the US departure in January 2017 had been considered dead in the water. This article considers the reasoning for the renegotiation of the TPP from the perspective of Australian society with focus on copyright law. It utilises the theoretical underpinning of cooperation theory as well as case studies of the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA) and the TPP to examine why it was necessary to renegotiate the TPP and significantly cut back on the IP chapter. This article concludes that it was necessary to renegotiate the TPP because it represented the US copyright agenda and failed to satisfy the Australian interests in copyright law and promote the copyright balance.

Suggested Citation

  • Christina Platz, 2018. "The Copyright Crisis: The Social necessity of the Renegotiation of the TPP and the Rise of the CPTPP," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 8209052, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:8209052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/39th-international-academic-conference-amsterdam/table-of-content/detail?cid=82&iid=037&rid=9052
    File Function: First version, 2018
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Copyright law; trade agreement; technology; intellectual property;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:8209052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.