Author
Abstract
In this study, we discuss a pedagogical innovation we?ve termed ?Executive Grand Rounds? and demonstrate its merits for graduate students. Executive Grand Rounds is a teaching method that combines case-based experiential learning and the traditional ?grand rounds? method historically used in medicine. Despite its evident benefits in medical education (e.g., Van Hoof, Monson, Majdalany, Giannotti, & Meehan, 2009), the grand rounds method has not been reported as being applied to teaching MBA students. In this paper, we demonstrate how self-generated case analysis can be integrated into grand rounds and explain how our approach can successfully build on the principles of Project based learning (PBL) and Evidence based management (EMB). We also discuss how Executive Grand Rounds can mitigate some frequently reported challenges of PBL and EBM. Upon describing the use of the method in the Leading Teams course taught within a cohort-based Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA) program, we provide empirical evidence that EGR results in a highly engaged class of self-directed learners effectively applying research to everyday situations to (a) build successful teams, (b) engage in critical thinking based upon a body of knowledge, and (c) to develop their own leadership capacity. In our experience, Executive Grand Rounds - particularly when student cases are analyzed in and by a team - lead to multiple perspective and solutions, encouraging diversity of thinking and critical thinking skills. Based on EMBA students? achievement of learning outcomes, qualitative and quantitative feedback from students, and our own assessment of executive grand rounds, we are encouraged by the results and invite the larger teaching community to further adapt and refine this distinctive pedagogical process.
Suggested Citation
Elena Lvina & C. Ken Weidner II, 2018.
"Problem-Based Learning and Evidence Based Management in ?Executive Grand Rounds?,"
Proceedings of International Academic Conferences
7209377, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
Handle:
RePEc:sek:iacpro:7209377
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:7209377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.