IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/4006472.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Tax burden inequality of population in Georgia and conceptual ? methodological problems of evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Tamar Kbiladze

    (Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University)

  • David Kbiladze

    (David Agmashenebeli University of Georgia, Guram Tavartkiladze Teaching University)

Abstract

Fairly determined taxes and tax burden of population is one of the most important criteria for living standards evaluation. Should tax rates be the same for everyone? This is the challenge which every government meets and successful decision regarding this issue is very important for sustainable development of the economy. The aim of the conducted research is to propose methodology and evaluate existing tax burden of population in Georgia. Empirical study was performed in order to reveal heaviness and lightness of population tax burden. On the basis of empirical research, we conclude that tax burden of population in Georgia, considering their income, is unequal, while according to tax code of Georgia, income of individuals is taxed by flat rate of 20%. Result of investigation, described in the article will be useful for executive and legislative authorities of Georgia to make decisions regarding tax system in Georgia, also for scientists and students who have research interest in the same field.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamar Kbiladze & David Kbiladze, 2016. "Tax burden inequality of population in Georgia and conceptual ? methodological problems of evaluation," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 4006472, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:4006472
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/24th-international-academic-conference-barcelona/table-of-content/detail?cid=40&iid=046&rid=6472
    File Function: First version, 2016
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Decile inequality; Proportional tax system; Progressive tax system; Tax burden; Tax rate; Population;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H21 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
    • H24 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:4006472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.