IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/14216135.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Libertarian or Communitarian Community? Attempting to Resolve the Debate Using Actor-Network Theory (ANT)

Author

Listed:
  • Rafa? W??

    (Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toru?)

Abstract

The comparison between a libertarian community and a communitarian one is presented. This comparison is different from the standard contrast between liberal and communitarian communities. This departure arises from the broad nature of liberalism, posing a challenge in providing a concise definition within this brief presentation. The perception of community may vary among liberals, with some aligning more with libertarians and others with communitarians (Szahaj 2000). Obviously, libertarianism and communitarianism, as ideologies, are not entirely homogeneous. In this context, they are treated as Weberian ideal types (Weber 2011). Essentially, a community based on voluntary relations among free individuals is advocated by libertarianism (Hayek 1958; Rothbard 1992), while communitarianism, regardless of political leaning, presupposes individuals' embeddedness in a community, a larger entity chosen not entirely voluntarily. (Sandel 1982; Taylor 1994). In this presentation, a resolution to this debate is proposed through Actor-Network Theory (ANT), which posits an ontologically flat world comprising actors and their connections. As these connections are not immediately apparent, ANT suggests exploring relationships by tracing the actions of actors (Latour 1993; 2004; 2005). Both libertarianism and communitarianism diverge from this postulate, both of them a priori define a specific worldview and human subjectivity.References:- Hayek Fredrich, ?Individualism and Economic Order?, The University of Chicago Press, 1958.- Latour Bruno, ?We have never been modern?, transl. Catherine Porter, Harvard University Press, 1993.- Latour Bruno, ?Politics of Nature - How to bring the sciences into democracy?, transl. Catherine Porter, Harvard University Press, 2004.- Latour Bruno, ?Reassembling the Social? ? An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory?, Oxford University Press, 2005.- Rothbard Murray, ?How and How Not to Desocialize?, The Review of Austrian Economics 6:1 (1992). - Sandel Michael, ?Liberalism and the Limits of Justice?, Cambridge University Press, 1982.- Szahaj Andrzej, ?Jednostka czy wspólnota? Spór libera?ów z komunitarystami a ?sprawa polska??, Fundacja ALETHEIA, 2000.- Taylor Charles, ?Sources of the Self. The making of Modern Identity?, Harvard University Press, 1994.- Weber Max, ?Methodology of Social Sciences? transl. Edward A. Shils, Henry A. Finch, Transaction Publishers, 2011.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafa? W??, 0000. "The Libertarian or Communitarian Community? Attempting to Resolve the Debate Using Actor-Network Theory (ANT)," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 14216135, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:14216135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/iises-international-academic-conference-vienna-142/table-of-content/detail?cid=142&iid=016&rid=16135
    File Function: First version, 0000
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    social philosophy; philosophy of culture; political theory; community; libertarianism; communitarianism; ANT;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:14216135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.