Author
Listed:
- Young-Hyun Jin
(Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning)
- Yong-Gook Bae
(Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning)
- Jihee Kang
(Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning)
- Jeong Il Park
(Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning)
- Sangki Jeong
(Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning)
Abstract
?Convergence? is one of the most frequently heard keywords in recent economic development discussions. Convergence between technologies (technological convergence) is now widely known to be an effective strategy for Science and Technology (S&T) innovation. Industry convergence is also recognized as a promising mechanism for creating new markets. Many researchers have been trying to measure and analyze the convergence phenomena. Though some successfully describe the current status of technological and/or industry convergence, the relationship between technological convergence and industry convergence has not yet been empirically and comprehensively studied. In this study, we empirically analyzed recent cases of technological and industry convergence in South Korea and the relationships between them. Patent data were used to analyze technological convergence. If more than two different classification codes (subclass of the IPC code) appeared in one patent, we considered it a new case of convergence between the two (or more) technologies. Thus, the degree of convergence between two technologies is represented by the number of patent having two different classification codes related to the technologies. All patent applications in Korea from 2009 to 2011 were surveyed and the results were visualized and analyzed using the social network analysis (SNA) method. This study used the production inducement coefficients (more specifically, the forward linkage effect) from the input-output analysis (I/O analysis) as a proxy for the degree of industry convergence, for the lack of a more widely-accepted methodology in the literature. From structural changes in the production inducement effect, we infer the convergence between industries (industry convergence from the economic point of view). In order to analyze the relationship between technological convergence and industry convergence, the technological convergence network obtained from patent analysis was converted into a technology-mediated industry convergence network (industry convergence from the technological point of view) using a patent-industry concordance table. The network of the technology-mediated industry convergence was compared to the industry convergence network deduced from the I/O analysis. The results show that technological convergence is active in the electrical engineering and chemistry fields. Across technology fields, however, convergence is limited. The convergence between electronics/electrical engineering industries was active from both the technological and economic point of view. However, the technology-mediated industry convergence network between electronics/electrical engineering industries and general/special industrial machinery industries does not indicate convergence in the economic point of view.More detailed results will be presented in the conference.
Suggested Citation
Young-Hyun Jin & Yong-Gook Bae & Jihee Kang & Jeong Il Park & Sangki Jeong, 2014.
"Empirical Study on the Relationship Between Technological Convergence and Industry Convergence in Korea,"
Proceedings of International Academic Conferences
0802500, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
Handle:
RePEc:sek:iacpro:0802500
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
technology convergence;
industry convergence;
convergence;
All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
- O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following
NEP Reports:
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:0802500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.