IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sef/csefwp/715.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Lower Stackelberg equilibria:from bilevel optimization to Stackelberg games

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Both pessimistic and optimistic bilevel optimization problems may be not stable under perturbation when the lower-level problem has not a unique solution, meaning that the limit of sequences of solutions (resp. equilibria) to perturbed bilevel problems is not necessarily a solution (resp. an equilibrium) to the original problem. In this paper, we investigate the notion of lower Stackelberg equilibrium, an equilibrium concept arising as a limit point of pessimistic equilibria and of optimistic equilibria of perturbed bilevel problems. First, connections with pessimistic equilibria and optimistic equilibria are obtained in a general setting, together with existence and closure results. Secondly, the problem of finding a lower Stackelberg equilibrium is shown to be stable under general perturbation, differently from what happens for pessimistic and optimistic bilevel problems. Then, moving to the game theory viewpoint, the set of lower Stackelberg equilibria is proved to coincide with the set of subgame perfect Nash equilibrium outcomes of the associated Stackelberg game. These results allow to achieve a comprehensive look on various equilibrium concepts in bilevel optimization and in Stackelberg games as well as to add a new interpretation in terms of game theory to previous limit results on pessimistic equilibria and optimistic equilibria under perturbation.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Caruso & Maria Carmela Ceparano & Jacqueline Morgan, 2024. "Lower Stackelberg equilibria:from bilevel optimization to Stackelberg games," CSEF Working Papers 715, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
  • Handle: RePEc:sef:csefwp:715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.csef.it/WP/wp715.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sef:csefwp:715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Maria Carannante (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cssalit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.