IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sce/scecfa/344.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Non-constant volatility models a comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Paolo Foschi

    (Univ. of Bologna)

Abstract

Option pricing model with non-constant volatility models are compared to stochastic volatility ones. The non-constant volatility models considered are the Dupire's local volatility and Hobson and Rogers path-dependent volatility models. These approaches have the theoretical advantage of preserving the completeness of the market. The stochastic volatility models discussed are the Heston stochastic volatility and the SABR models. Because of their two-factor nature these models are notably flexible. The performances of the models are compared by considering their fit to the term structure of implied volatility, their robustness on the hedging and pricing of vanilla and exotic options.

Suggested Citation

  • Paolo Foschi, 2006. "Non-constant volatility models a comparison," Computing in Economics and Finance 2006 344, Society for Computational Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:sce:scecfa:344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Stochastic volatility; option pricing; calibration; exotic options;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C00 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - General
    • G13 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecfa:344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sceeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.