IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sau/sozspd/2101.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The universal basic income grant (UBIG): A comparative review of the characteristics and impact

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Mathebula

Abstract

In recent years, public debates, pilot projects and academic research have internationally boosted the prominence of the universal basic income grant (UBIG) as a policy option. Despite this prominence, the arguments and evidence of the UBIG discussion have not been systematically put forward and discussed in light of the different UBIG conceptual understandings and applications. This paper adds value to the debate by systematic presenting the social, economical and political arguments in support of and against a UBIG. It furthermore discusses the UBIG dimensions/characteristics and variations, and also pose questions about whether all the UBIG experiments can really be classified as a UBIG. Antagonist of a UBIG often raise concerns about the negative effect of the lack of conditions and targeting in a UBIG. Since evidence on the impact of UBIG is limited, this paper turns to the evidence base on unconditional cash transfers and conditional cash transfers. The results show that it is the cash transfer rather than the conditionality and targeting that produce positive outcomes in areas of personal wellbeing.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Mathebula, 2021. "The universal basic income grant (UBIG): A comparative review of the characteristics and impact," Social Policy in Demand: A Working Paper Series 2021/01, Department of Social Policy and Social Securities, Hochschule Bonn-Rhein-Sieg.
  • Handle: RePEc:sau:sozspd:2101
    DOI: 10.18418/978-3-96043-089-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pub.h-brs.de/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/5345/file/202103_WorkingPapers_Mathebula_PRINT.pdf
    File Function: Download
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18418/978-3-96043-089-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Unconditional basic income grant (UBIG); cash transfers (CT); unconditional cash transfers (UCT); conditional cash transfer (CCT); conditionality and targeting;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sau:sozspd:2101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.h-brs.de/en/sv .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.