IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rug/rugwps/17-942.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Development And Validation Of An Instrument To Measure The Capabilities For Managing Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Amy Van Looy

Abstract

In their strive for higher business performance, organizations are strategically adopting capabilities for managing their business processes. To succeed in this complex endeavor, managers are offered a variety of maturity models with best practices. Also scholars have reused the maturity models or they developed an instrument themselves to further investigate those capabilities. While maturity models generally suffer from their foundation, validation and capability coverage, the related academic measurement instruments have similar restrictions. Consequently, during a four-year project, we followed a high-standard and multi-staged procedure to develop and validate a comprehensive measurement instrument with four main capability areas, 13 sub areas and 62 items. This set can be considered as most relevant for managing business processes. Our work reports about the instrument’s development procedure to show high levels of construct validity, content validity and reliability in order to facilitate its adoption. Since the final measurement instrument is publicly available and free to use (in full or in part), it intends to help other scholars in their research and practitioners in gaining insight into their current and future business practices. The article concludes with concrete examples of research streams and business situations in which the instrument can be applied.

Suggested Citation

  • Amy Van Looy, 2017. "The Development And Validation Of An Instrument To Measure The Capabilities For Managing Processes," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 17/942, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:17/942
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wps-feb.ugent.be/Papers/wp_17_942.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:17/942. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nathalie Verhaeghe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ferugbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.