IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rug/rugwps/11-744.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The EU Apportionment Formula: Insights from a Business Case

Author

Listed:
  • A. ROGGEMAN
  • I. VERLEYEN
  • P. VAN CAUWENBERGE
  • C. COPPENS

Abstract

First, this paper gives an overview of the progress Europe has made in its development of a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB). Second, we use firm level data from a listed multinational to investigate how several designs for the CCCTB apportionment formula could affect the allocation of the consolidated tax base. The design is relevant in the light of member states’ concern for protecting their tax revenues, as well as for the multinational companies’ tax minimizing possibilities. Moreover, it plays an important role in achieving an efficient and simple tax system. Simulating different apportionment formulas, the results show that including more factors and using more equal weights distributes the common tax base more equally, which could reduce the incentive to shift factors from high to low tax countries. The results also indicate that simplifying the factor definitions, leads to rather minor changes in the allocation. Using unpublished data, this study allows to investigate the consequences of different formulas in detail, which contributes to the current discussion on corporate tax harmonization in the EU.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Roggeman & I. Verleyen & P. Van Cauwenberge & C. Coppens, 2011. "The EU Apportionment Formula: Insights from a Business Case," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 11/744, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:11/744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wps-feb.ugent.be/Papers/wp_11_744.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    CCCTB; corporate tax; European Union; apportionment formula;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:11/744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nathalie Verhaeghe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ferugbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.