IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rug/rugwps/07-448.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Corporate governance and Board Effectiveness : beyond formalism

Author

Listed:
  • A. LEVRAU
  • L.A.A. VAN DEN BERGHE

Abstract

This study provides insight into the dominant methodological practices that have shaped the field of negotiation over the past four decades, and sheds light on possible gaps and trade-offs. We content analyzed 941 peer reviewed negotiation articles (published between 1965-2004) for methodology. We distinguished key issues in negotiation research and identified methodological trends over time (1965-2004). The results reveal significant changes in reliability, validity and triangulation issues. In addition, the rise of multivariate statistics and multiple data-sources displays a positive evolution towards more sophisticated methodologies. However, more attention is needed to address the enduring lack of longitudinal designs and qualitative techniques in negotiation research.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Levrau & L.A.A. Van Den Berghe, 2007. "Corporate governance and Board Effectiveness : beyond formalism," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 07/448, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    • Handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:07/448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wps-feb.ugent.be/Papers/wp_07_448.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bananuka, Juma & Night, Sadress & Ngoma, Muhammed & Najjemba, Grace Muganga, 2019. "Internet financial reporting adoption: Exploring the influence of board role performance and isomorphic forces," Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, Universidad ESAN, vol. 24(48), pages 266-287.
    2. Naeem Tabassum & Satwinder Singh, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Organisational Performance," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-48527-6, July.
    3. Eric Fosu Oteng-Abayie & Anthony Affram & Henry Kofi Mensah, 2018. "Corporate Governance and Efficiency of Rural and Community Banks (RCBs) in Ghana," Econometric Research in Finance, SGH Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, vol. 3(2), pages 93-118, December.
    4. Verica Babić & Jelena Nikolić & Jelena Erić, 2011. "Rethinking Board Roles Performance: Towards Integrative Model," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 56(190), pages 140-162, July – Se.
    5. Lippert, Inge, 2008. "Perspektivenverschiebungen in der Corporate Governance: Neuere Ansätze und Studien der Corporate-Governance-Forschung," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Knowledge, Production Systems and Work SP III 2008-302, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    6. Gad Jacek, 2015. "The Relationship Between Supervisory Board And Management And Their Communication Processes In Publicly Listed Companies In Poland / Relacje Między Radą Nadzorczą I Zarządem Oraz Proces Ich Komunikacj," Comparative Economic Research, Sciendo, vol. 18(2), pages 139-160, June.
    7. repec:bfv:journl:031 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Graţiela Georgiana Noja & Mirela Cristea & Nicoleta Sîrghi & Oana-Ramona Socoliuc Guriță & Ioana Vădăsan & Daniel Cîrciumaru, 2023. "Corporate governance, ownership concentration and performance of European agricultural companies: New empirical evidence," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(4), pages 151-161.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    negotiation; research methodology; review; validity; triangulation;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:07/448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nathalie Verhaeghe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ferugbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.