IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rsw/rswwps/rswwps157.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Zur Entwicklung der Dateninfrastruktur in Deutschland

Author

Listed:
  • Roland Habich
  • Ralf K. Himmelreicher
  • Denis Huschka

Abstract

Die Analyse der Statik und Dynamik sozialer Phänomene anhand von empirischen Daten hat in den Sozialwissenschaften eine lange Tradition (Adorno 1970; Lowe 1926). Am Anfang des 21. Jahrhunderts können Forschende auf eine Vielzahl qualitativ hochwertiger Daten zurückgreifen (Fachinger u. a. 2010), weshalb zum einen zahlreiche Forschungsprojekte erst ermöglicht wurden und zum anderen nicht mehr in jedem Fall eigene Datenerhebungen benötigt werden. So positiv die Entwicklungen hin zu mehr Datenverfügbarkeit zu bewerten sind, so aktuell ist es aber auch, die Daten im Rahmen einer geordneten und transparenten Infrastruktur zur Verfügung zu stellen. Neben den klassischen Datenarchiven sind die vom Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten initiierten Forschungsdatenzentren (FDZ) und Datenservicezentren (DSZ) Teil einer Forschungsinfrastruktur. Die meisten der intensiv ausgewerteten Datensätze sind heute als Mikrodatensätze über diese Forschungsdateninfrastruktur beziehbar.

Suggested Citation

  • Roland Habich & Ralf K. Himmelreicher & Denis Huschka, 2010. "Zur Entwicklung der Dateninfrastruktur in Deutschland," RatSWD Working Papers 157, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
  • Handle: RePEc:rsw:rswwps:rswwps157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.konsortswd.de/wp-content/uploads/RatSWD_WP_157.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Pullinger & Gert G. Wagner, 2010. "On the Respective Roles of National Libraries, National Archives and Research Data Centers in the Preservation of and Access to Research Data," RatSWD Working Papers 153, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
    2. Stefan Bender & Ralf Himmelreicher & Sylvia Zühlke & Markus Zwick, 2009. "Improvement of Access to Data Sets from the Official Statistics," RatSWD Working Papers 118, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
    3. The German Data Forum, 2010. "Building on Progress - Expanding the Research Infrastructure for the Economic, Social, and Behavioral Sciences," Schmollers Jahrbuch : Journal of Applied Social Science Studies / Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 130(3), pages 421-443.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neffke, Frank M.H. & Otto, Anne & Weyh, Antje, 2017. "Inter-industry labor flows," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 275-292.
    2. Giesecke, Matthias, 2019. "The retirement mortality puzzle: Evidence from a regression discontinuity design," Ruhr Economic Papers 800, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    3. Max Kaase, 2011. "EMPIRISCHE SOZIALFORSCHUNG IN DEUTSCHLAND. Entwicklungslinien, Errungenschaften und Zukunftsperspektiven," RatSWD Working Papers 189, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
    4. Bettina Sonnenberg & Michaela Riediger & Cornelia Wrzus & Gert G. Wagner, 2011. "Measuring Time Use in Surveys: How Valid Are Time Use Questions in Surveys? Concordance of Survey and Experience Sampling Measures," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 390, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    5. Anke Böckenhoff & Denise Saßenroth & Martin Kroh & Thomas Siedler & Peter Eibich & Gert G. Wagner, 2013. "The Socio-Economic Module of the Berlin Aging Study II (SOEP-BASE): Description, Structure, and Questionnaire," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 568, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    6. Neffke, Frank & Otto, Anne & Weyh, Antje, 2017. "Skill-relatedness matrices for Germany : Data method and access," FDZ Methodenreport 201704_en, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    7. repec:iab:iabfme:201704(en is not listed on IDEAS
    8. David Richter & Jürgen Schupp, 2012. "SOEP Innovation Sample (SOEP-IS): Description, Structure and Documentation," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 463, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsw:rswwps:rswwps157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RatSWD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rtswdde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.