IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rsc/rsceui/2014-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Democratic representation and religion. Differences and convergences between the European Parliament and the US House of Representatives

Author

Listed:
  • François Foret

Abstract

It is common to oppose a secular Europe to a religious America. As representatives of cultural diversity and popular sovereignty, Parliaments are the best illustrations of mutual arrangements between politics and religion. Little data is available on religion at the EP, in contrast to the rich scholarship on the Congress. Relying on the first survey of its kind on members of the European Parliament (MEPs), the article analyses what they believe and what they do with these beliefs. The purpose is to understand how religion interacts with representation and political socialization of MEPs within and outside the assembly. The American House of Representatives is used as a reference case study. Overall, there are significant differences between European and American legislators, mainly due to their distinct social, cultural, political and institutional environments. However, several common logics may also be seen at work, suggesting that the EU is not as exceptional as is often thought.

Suggested Citation

  • François Foret, 2014. "Democratic representation and religion. Differences and convergences between the European Parliament and the US House of Representatives," RSCAS Working Papers 2014/58, European University Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:rsc:rsceui:2014/58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/31404/RSCAS%20_2014_58.pdf?sequence=1
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1814/31404
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Religion; European Union; US; parliamentary politics; European Parliament;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsc:rsceui:2014/58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RSCAS web unit (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rsiueit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.