IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rri/wpaper/2004wp04.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Non-Linear Input-Output Models: Practicability and Potential

Author

Listed:
  • Guy R. West

    (Department of Economics, University of Queensland)

  • Randall Jackson

    (Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University)

Abstract

The conventional input-output model has been widely criticized, both justly and unjustly, for its limiting assumptions. One of these assumptions is homogeneity of degree one. This paper explores some approaches to minimize this limitation of traditional input-output analysis by removing the assumption of linear coefficients for the intermediate and household sectors. As is well documented in the literature, the household sector is the dominant component of multiplier effects in an input-output model, so using marginal income and expenditure coefficients for the household sector provides a more accurate estimate of the multiplier effects. A price model can then be utilized to estimate the relative changes in local to imported inputs. There are several implications arising from the use of this model, compared to the conventional input-output model. Firstly, while the output multipliers and impacts may not be significantly different between the two models, we would expect the income and employment impacts to be smaller in the marginal coefficient model. This is because many industries, especially those which are more capital intensive and can implement further productivity gains, can increase output, particularly in the short run, without corresponding proportional increases in employment and hence income payments. However, when price effects are incorporated into the model, the direction of change becomes less clear. Secondly, unlike the conventional input-output model in which the multiplier value is the same for all multiples of the initial shock, the multiplier values from the marginal coefficient model vary with the size of the initial impact. Thus larger changes in final demand will tend to be associated with smaller multipliers than small changes in final demand. Therefore, the differential impacts of the marginal coefficient model are not additive, unlike the conventional (linear) Leontief model and CGE model. While not attempting to be a substitute for a CGE model, the methods described in this paper could be used where construction of CGE models are impracticable due to cost and data considerations.

Suggested Citation

  • Guy R. West & Randall Jackson, 2004. "Non-Linear Input-Output Models: Practicability and Potential," Working Papers Working Paper 2004-04, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
  • Handle: RePEc:rri:wpaper:2004wp04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/rri_pubs/115/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jackson, Randall W., 1989. "Probabilistic input-output analysis: Modeling directions," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 23(1-2), pages 87-95.
    2. Lahiri, Sajal, 1976. "Input-Output Analysis with Scale-Dependent Coefficients," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 44(5), pages 947-961, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jeroen Klijs & Jack Peerlings & Wim Heijman, 2017. "Introducing labour productivity changes into models used for economic impact analysis in tourism," Tourism Economics, , vol. 23(3), pages 561-576, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Persson, Håkan, 2005. "A Fixed Point Theorem for Monotone Functions equivalent to Browers theorem," Working Papers 2005:1, Örebro University, School of Business.
    2. Hewings, Geoffrey J D & Jensen, Rodney C, 1988. "Emerging Challenges in Regional Input-Output Analysis," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 22(0), pages 43-53, February.
    3. Christa Court & Randall W. Jackson, 2010. "Time Dynamics and the Introduction of New Technologies within IO Analysis," Working Papers Working Paper 2010-03, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
    4. Sergio Rey & Guy West & Mark Janikas, 2004. "Uncertainty in Integrated Regional Models," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 259-277.
    5. Kriens, J. & van Lieshout, J.T.H.C. & Roemen, J.H.J. & Verheyen, P.A., 1983. "Management accounting and operational research," Other publications TiSEM da4f2baa-f699-48f2-80b7-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Esteban Fernandez-Vazquez, 2015. "Empirical Estimation Of Non-Linear Input--Output Models: An Entropy Econometrics Approach," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 508-524, December.
    7. Manfred Lenzen, 2001. "A Generalized Input-Output Multiplier Calculus for Australia," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 65-92.
    8. MESNARD, Louis de, 2008. "On the impossibility of calculating the product technology in the Supply-Use model," LEG - Document de travail - Economie 2008-06, LEG, Laboratoire d'Economie et de Gestion, CNRS, Université de Bourgogne.
    9. repec:rri:wpaper:201003 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Umed Temurshoev, 2015. "Uncertainty treatment in input-output analysis," Working Papers 2015-004, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    input-output; modeling; regional development;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • P25 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • C67 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Input-Output Models
    • R15 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Econometric and Input-Output Models; Other Methods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rri:wpaper:2004wp04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Randall Jackson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rrwvuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.