IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rom/confkm/49.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Quality Of The Academic Programmes

Author

Listed:
  • Constanta Nicoleta BODEA

    (The Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Xiangnan LU

    (Zhejiang University, China)

  • Corneliu BODEA

    (University of Richmond, VA, USA)

Abstract

The main issue addressed by this paper refers to the quality of training and education on project management – is it different than the perception of quality of training and education in other fields, if so, where, in what aspects, who should be responsible for it, should it only be addressed as input based – provider, trainer, curriculum, or also output based – trainee, etc. A survey was made and the main results are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Constanta Nicoleta BODEA & Xiangnan LU & Corneliu BODEA, 2009. "Quality Of The Academic Programmes," Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Knowledge Management: Projects, Systems and Technologies,Bucharest, November 6-7 2009 49, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, Academy of Economic Studies and National Defence University "Carol I", DEPARTMENT FOR MANAGEMENT OF THE DEFENCE RESOURCES AND EDUCATION.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:confkm:49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccasp.ase.ro/KM2009/49.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Quality; Project management training and education;

    JEL classification:

    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:confkm:49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mogos Radu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.