IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rnp/wpaper/w202346.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Legal regulation prospects of the use of algorithms in anti-corruption expertise of legal acts and drafts of legal acts
[Перспективы Правового Регулирования Использования Алгоритмов Искусственного Интеллекта Для Проведения Антикоррупционной Экспертизы Нормативных Правовых Актов И Проектов Нормативных Правовых Актов]

Author

Listed:
  • Talapina, Elvira

    (The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Yuzhakov, Vladimir

    (The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Efremov, Alexey

    (The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Chereshneva, Irina

    (The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

Abstract

The experience of using artificial intelligence algorithms in rulemaking allows us to expect that they are able to reduce time and personnel costs, subjectivity of experts, and unify the results of the examination and their presentation in the anti-corruption examination of legal acts. However, the legislation does not yet allow the official use of AI algorithms for this purpose, therefore the study of regulation prospects of the use of algorithms in anti-corruption expertise of legal acts becomes relevant. The purpose of the study is to prepare proposals for the legal regulation of the use of AI algorithms for conducting anti-corruption expertise of legal acts and draft of legal acts. The subject of the research is scientific publications, legal acts of international and national level, the results of anti-corruption examinations. Research methods: formal legal and historical legal methods, comparative legal method, method of legal interpretation, logical analysis, general scientific methods of classification and modeling. The research of the results: opportunities and advantages of using artificial intelligence algorithms for the anti-corruption examination of legal acts; justification of the need to reform the current legislation in order to legalize the use of algorithms for the anti-corruption examination of legal acts; proposals for the regulation of artificial intelligence algorithms in the anti-corruption examination of legal acts. The study shows the need to reform the current legislation to legalize the possibility of using artificial intelligence algorithms for conducting anti-corruption expertise; the possibility and prospects of legal regulation of the use of artificial intelligence algorithms for conducting anti- corruption expertise of legal acts. The lack of scientific developments in the field of algorithmization of anti-corruption expertise of legal acts determines the scientific novelty of the study. We recommend applying the results of the study to develop the legal regulation and methodology of algorithms using in anti-corruption expertise of legal acts, as well as for the development of relevant legislation.

Suggested Citation

  • Talapina, Elvira & Yuzhakov, Vladimir & Efremov, Alexey & Chereshneva, Irina, 2023. "Legal regulation prospects of the use of algorithms in anti-corruption expertise of legal acts and drafts of legal acts [Перспективы Правового Регулирования Использования Алгоритмов Искусственного ," Working Papers w202346, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:w202346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/wpaper/w202346.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    public administration; anti-corruption expertise; algorithm; artificial intelligence; legal act;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration
    • K38 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Human Rights Law; Gender Law; Animal Rights Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:w202346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.