IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rnp/wpaper/w2022085.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Protection Of Public Values: Evaluating State Regulatory Enforcement Activity From Citizen Perspective
[Защищенность Охраняемых Законом Ценностей: Оценка Государственного Контроля С Позиции Граждан В 2022 Году]

Author

Listed:
  • Yuzhakov, Vladimir (Южаков, Владимир)

    (The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Dobrolyubova, Elena (Добролюбова, Елена)

    (The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Pokida, Andrei (Покида, Андрей)

    (The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Zybunovskaya, Natalia (Зыбуновская, Наталья)

    (The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

Abstract

The federal legislation defines a list of regulatory enforcement activities aimed at minimizing risks to legally protected public values (such as life and health, property, privacy, other human rights, plants and animals, natural habitats). Therefore, monitoring studies aiming at collecting public perceptions of the protection of these public values are highly relevant for tracking the reform progress. The goal of this paper is to identify public perceptions of the extent of protection of public values and evaluate regulatory enforcement performance. The subject of the study is regulatory enforcement activity aimed at reducing risks to the public values. The primary method of the study is a representative public survey, the findings of which are compared to earlier surveys carried out in 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021. The results presented in the paper include an analysis of the dynamics in public perception of the effectiveness and efficiency of the state regulatory enforcement activities. The paper concludes that while there are some positive trends in improving public perceptions of the safety of public values, the overall level of these perceptions is unsatisfactory. Less than a half of all the survey participants have positive perceptions on any of the risks considered. The frequency of risk events remains high: half of the respondents faced at least one risk in the 2 years preceding the survey. Both time and financial costs borne by citizens applying for protection to the state regulatory and enforcement authorities have not changed significantly. This shows that the efficiency of state regulatory enforcement authorities has not improved in the public view. The novelty of the study is related to collecting and analyzing empirical data to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of state regulatory enforcement bodies, as perceived by the public. The paper recommends streamlining the procedures for handling citizen complaints to state regulatory enforcement bodies and improving public access to information on the ways of protecting public values from the risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuzhakov, Vladimir (Южаков, Владимир) & Dobrolyubova, Elena (Добролюбова, Елена) & Pokida, Andrei (Покида, Андрей) & Zybunovskaya, Natalia (Зыбуновская, Наталья), 2022. "Protection Of Public Values: Evaluating State Regulatory Enforcement Activity From Citizen Perspective [Защищенность Охраняемых Законом Ценностей: Оценка Государственного Контроля С Позиции Граждан," Working Papers w2022085, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:w2022085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/wpaper/w2022085.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Effectiveness; governance; public values protected by law; regulatory enforcement bodies; public sociological survey; safety perceptions; client centricity; state regulatory enforcement and inspections activity.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H41 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Public Goods
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:w2022085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.