IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rnp/wpaper/w2022084.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Quality Of Government Regulatory Enforcement And Regulatory Burden Level In 2022: Evaluation From Private Business Perspective
[Качество Государственного Контроля И Уровень Регулятивной Нагрузки: Оценка С Позиции Частного Бизнеса В 2022 Году]

Author

Listed:
  • Yuzhakov, Vladimir (Южаков, Владимир)

    (The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Dobrolyubova, Elena (Добролюбова, Елена)

    (The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Pokida, Andrei (Покида, Андрей)

    (The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Zybunovskaya, Natalia (Зыбуновская, Наталья)

    (The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

Abstract

Evaluating the outcomes of the large-scale reforms of regulatory policies and enforcement and inspection practices conducted in Russia requires a business perspective, making this study highly relevant to the current governance agenda. The goal of the paper is to evaluate the private businesses’ perceptions regarding the quality of state regulatory enforcement and inspection activities and the regulatory burden on businesses. The subject of the study is the quality of state regulatory enforcement and inspection activities, including its justification, effectiveness, and efficiency, and the regulatory burden. The key method of the study is a representative sociological survey of private business entities. The results presented in the paper include the analysis of private business perceptions regarding all parameters of state regulatory enforcement and inspection quality (justification, effectiveness, and efficiency) as well as evaluations of regulatory burden. The study concludes that the perceptions of justified nature and efficiency of state regulatory enforcement activities have improved, compared to the outcomes of previous surveys conducted in 2017, 2020, and 2021. The business perceptions of adequacy of the regulatory requirements and the ease of compliance have also improved. However, the perceived impact of state regulatory enforcement on reducing risks of damage to the public values still remains low. No significant changes have been recorded in the perception of regulatory burden. The novelty of the study is related to collection and analysis of new empirical data on how businesses perceive the quality of regulatory enforcement and inspection activities and regulatory burden. The recommendations made based on the study results suggest the need for further improvement of both regulatory enforcement and regulation itself. Both regulation and regulatory enforcement activities should be more oriented at minimizing the risks of damage to public values and strengthening the positive impact of inspection activity on the safety of business facilities, processes and products.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuzhakov, Vladimir (Южаков, Владимир) & Dobrolyubova, Elena (Добролюбова, Елена) & Pokida, Andrei (Покида, Андрей) & Zybunovskaya, Natalia (Зыбуновская, Наталья), 2022. "Quality Of Government Regulatory Enforcement And Regulatory Burden Level In 2022: Evaluation From Private Business Perspective [Качество Государственного Контроля И Уровень Регулятивной Нагрузки: О," Working Papers w2022084, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:w2022084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/wpaper/w2022084.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Evaluating effectiveness and efficiency; governance; justified government interference; public values; regulatory burden; sociological survey; state regulatory enforcement and inspections activity.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H41 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Public Goods
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:w2022084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.