IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rnp/wpaper/w2022083.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Government Digitalization: Evaluating Effectiveness And Risks From Public Perspective
[Цифровизация Государственного Управления: Оценка Результативности И Рисков С Позиции Граждан]

Author

Listed:
  • Dobrolyubova, Elena (Добролюбова, Елена)

    (The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Yuzhakov, Vladimir (Южаков, Владимир)

    (The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Pokida, Andrei (Покида, Андрей)

    (The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Zybunovskaya, Natalia (Зыбуновская, Наталья)

    (The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

Abstract

Digital transformation is one of Russia’s national goals and development objectives. Therefore, monitoring sociological studies aimed at collecting public perceptions of effectiveness and risks of government digitalization are highly relevant. The goal of this paper is to evaluate the effects of government digitalization from the public perspective. The subject of the study is the interaction between the state (public authorities and state institutions) and citizens with the use of digital technologies during the performance of publicly relevant government functions. The primary method of the study is a representative sociological public survey. The results presented in the paper contain an evaluation of the effectiveness of government digitalization from the citizens’ perspective, an analysis of the public readiness to engage in digital interaction with the public authorities as well as an evaluation of the risks associated with government digitalization, as perceived by the public. The paper demonstrates that a vast majority of Russians (88.2 percent) have engaged in digital interaction with the state over the past year. The study concludes that while overall evaluation of government digitalization effectiveness in terms of improving governance quality is positive, some areas are more problematic. For instance, less than a quarter of the respondents feels that the use of digital technology has improved the quality of education. Despite significant experience in digital interaction with the state, most respondents are not always ready to choose the digital channel for every issue. The choice of digital channel over other possible interaction means mostly depends on digital skills. The respondents evaluate the risks associated with government digitalization as high. Better educated respondents with higher digital skills are more likely to note that government digitalization risks are substantial, compared to other citizens. The novelty of the study is related to developing and implementing sociological instruments for measuring effectiveness and risks of government digitalization as perceived by the public. The paper recommends to account for the public evaluation of digital government effectiveness and risks while planning and implementing the government’s digital transformation initiatives at the federal and at the regional level.

Suggested Citation

  • Dobrolyubova, Elena (Добролюбова, Елена) & Yuzhakov, Vladimir (Южаков, Владимир) & Pokida, Andrei (Покида, Андрей) & Zybunovskaya, Natalia (Зыбуновская, Наталья), 2022. "Government Digitalization: Evaluating Effectiveness And Risks From Public Perspective [Цифровизация Государственного Управления: Оценка Результативности И Рисков С Позиции Граждан]," Working Papers w2022083, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:w2022083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/wpaper/w2022083.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Digital transformation; digitalization effectiveness; governance; public sociological survey; risk evaluation.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H41 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Public Goods
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:w2022083. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.