IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rnp/wpaper/s21118.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analysis of the stimulating effects of the distribution of targeted interbudgetary transfers in the Russian Federation
[Анализ Стимулирующих Эффектов Распределения Целевых Межбюджетных Трансфертов В Российской Федерации]

Author

Listed:
  • Alexeey Michael

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Arlashkin Igor

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Barbashova Natalia

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Deryugin Alexander

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Komarnitskaya Anna

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Sokolov Ilya

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

Abstract

The paper presents the results of an inventory of the regulations for the distribution of matching grants to the regions of Russia, as well as the evaluation of the direct stimulating effect of a specific grant using econometric analysis of panel data. The study allows to formulate specific recommendations for eliminating the identified negative incentives of matching grants and improving the existing methods of grants’ distribution to subnational governments.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexeey Michael & Arlashkin Igor & Barbashova Natalia & Deryugin Alexander & Komarnitskaya Anna & Sokolov Ilya, 2021. "Analysis of the stimulating effects of the distribution of targeted interbudgetary transfers in the Russian Federation [Анализ Стимулирующих Эффектов Распределения Целевых Межбюджетных Трансфертов ," Working Papers s21118, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:s21118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/wpaper/s21118.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    SUPREME AUDIT INSTITUTIONS; AUDIT; AUDIT SELECTION; JUDGEMENT; RISK ANALYSIS; EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:s21118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.