IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rnp/wpaper/051811.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

I Am Ashamed of... vs I Am Proud of...: History as an Accusation and Justification in Public Political Activities
[Мне Стыдно За… Vs Я Горжусь…: История Как Обвинение И Оправдание В Публичных Политических Акциях]

Author

Listed:
  • Arkhipova, Alexandra (Архипова, Александра)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

  • Radchenko, Darya

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

Abstract

Accepting the thesis that the political struggle is, to a large extent, a game the stake in which is the opportunity to impose on others its picture of the world as legitimate and generally accepted (P. Bourdieu), we can consider public actions devoted to pressing political issues as "moves" in this game, in which competing versions of the present, the past and the future are offered. The most explicit position of the group is expressed in the course of its public appearances (meetings, marches, etc.). The set of slogans, symbols, actions observed at every public action allows us to reconstruct the main narratives of the corresponding political force (party, movement). In the article, based on a quantitative analysis of the base of slogans and symbols collected on public actions in 2011-2016, it is determined how various political forces synthesize in their narratives and symbols the conflicting historical experience of the country.

Suggested Citation

  • Arkhipova, Alexandra (Архипова, Александра) & Radchenko, Darya, 2018. "I Am Ashamed of... vs I Am Proud of...: History as an Accusation and Justification in Public Political Activities [Мне Стыдно За… Vs Я Горжусь…: История Как Обвинение И Оправдание В Публичных Полит," Working Papers 051811, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:051811
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/wpaper/051811.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:051811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.