IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rnp/wpaper/031704.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Multifunctional Antimonopoly Bodies in the World Practice: Advantages and Risks
[Многофункциональные Антимонопольные Органы В Мировой Практике: Преимущества И Риски]

Author

Listed:
  • Tsyganov, Andrey (Цыганов, Андрей)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

  • Pavlova, Nataliya (Павлова, Наталья)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

Abstract

The institutional design of the competition authority is an important element of a successful state competition policy. At the same time, there is no doubt that "one size does not fit everyone", and the optimal choice between different structural alternatives will depend on the specific features of the economy and the institutional environment of a particular country. In the case of the multifunctionality of the antimonopoly body, specific benefits and risks appear that need to be taken into account when reforming the structure of the state apparatus. The article describes the main factors that can influence the choice of a design variant of a multi-functional antimonopoly body, and also analyzes the experience of the latest changes in the structure of the powers of the OECD antitrust authorities. Based on the analysis, several recommendations are proposed in the light of recent changes in the functions of the Federal Antimonopoly Service.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsyganov, Andrey (Цыганов, Андрей) & Pavlova, Nataliya (Павлова, Наталья), 2017. "Multifunctional Antimonopoly Bodies in the World Practice: Advantages and Risks [Многофункциональные Антимонопольные Органы В Мировой Практике: Преимущества И Риски]," Working Papers 031704, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:031704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/wpaper/031704.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frederic Jenny, 2016. "The Institutional Design of Competition Authorities: Debates and Trends," International Law and Economics, in: Frederic Jenny & Yannis Katsoulacos (ed.), Competition Law Enforcement in the BRICS and in Developing Countries, pages 1-57, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Avdasheva, Svetlana & Golovanova, Svetlana & Katsoulacos, Yannis, 2019. "The role of judicial review in developing evidentiary standards: The example of market analysis in Russian competition law enforcement," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 101-114.
    2. Yannis Katsoulacos & Vasiliki Bageri, 2022. "Objectives and the Optimal Structure of Competition Authorities Revisited," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 69-81, March.
    3. S. Avdasheva & S. Golovanova & Y. Katsoulacos, 2019. "Optimal Institutional Structure of Competition Authorities Under Reputation Maximization: A Model and Empirical Evidence from the Case of Russia," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 54(2), pages 251-282, March.
    4. Pavlova, Natalia (Павлова, Наталья), 2018. "Features of the Goals of Antimonopoly Authorities in Developing Countries on the Example of the BRICS Countries [Особенности Целей Антимонопольных Органов В Развивающихся Странах На Примере Стран Б," Working Papers 031838, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:031704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.