IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rjr/wpconf/151203.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

THE INDIVIDUALIZATION OF PUNISHMENT ACCORDING TO THE NEW CRIMINAL CODE (International Conference "Recent Advances in Economic and Social Research", 13-14 mai 2015, București)

Author

Listed:
  • Călin BERAR

    (PhD Student, West University of Timişoara, Faculty of Law, Contract no. POSDRU/159/1.5/S/137926 of Romanian Academy)

Abstract

The individualization of punishment implies finding the balance between the gravity of the crime and the personality of the criminal, on one hand, and the punishment that will be applied, on the other hand. The governing principle of this procedure is, undoubtedly, the principle of proportionality. Finding "the appropriate penalty" is a complex issue, in which each element can have an important role. Therefore, to ensure a proportion between the severity of the punishment and the seriousness of the offence it is imperative to determine those factors that support the proportionality test. So we must take into consideration the purpose of the punishment, the gravity of the offense, the offender's personality, the legislator’s conception about the criminal sanctions and any other relevant element. The new penal code brought significant changes in the field, such as establishing lower sanctions for crimes than the previous criminal code but higher penalties for those who commit more crimes.

Suggested Citation

  • Călin BERAR, 2015. "THE INDIVIDUALIZATION OF PUNISHMENT ACCORDING TO THE NEW CRIMINAL CODE (International Conference "Recent Advances in Economic and Social Research", 13-14 mai 2015, București)," Institute for Economic Forecasting Conference Proceedings 151203, Institute for Economic Forecasting.
  • Handle: RePEc:rjr:wpconf:151203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ipe.ro/RePEc/WorkingPapers/wpconf151203.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rjr:wpconf:151203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Corina Saman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipacaro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.