Author
Abstract
Occupational stress is the stress generated by activities at work with high responsibility, which results in a strain of employee skills and availability. The present study is a comparative study aims to identify experiential stress levels of employees in public relations departments and those without direct contact with the public in local government and the coping methods they use to reduce stress levels. Working hypotheses are: 1. Employees of public relations departments live a much higher stress levels than those without direct contact with the public departments. H0: No significant differences between values of stress levels compared to the two structures. H1: There are significant differences. 2. Employees of public relations departments will frequently use coping strategies focused on emotion than structures other employees, who will call more often centered on tactics problem. H0: No significant differences between values obtained from emotion-centered coping strategies, on that issue, the subjects of the two structures. H1: There are differences. Using interviews, personal inventory to assess stress and Lazarus and Folkman scale were obtained the following results: It disproves hypothesis 1. Null hypothesis is accepted, with significant differences between the two structures at the scale of "Medium." Hypothesis 2 is confirmed. Specific hypothesis H1 is accepted: there are significant differences in coping strategies, employees of public relations departments often turning to strategies centered on emotion. Proper relationship between stress levels and forms of coping training helps experienced different types of stress, and could aim to establish an employee to use learning strategies effectively in control of his reactions.
Suggested Citation
Craiovan, Petru & Ciocoiu, Marinela, 2011.
"Manifestations Of Occupational Stress,"
Papers
2011/310, Osterreichish-Rumanischer Akademischer Verein.
Handle:
RePEc:ris:sphedp:2011_310
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:sphedp:2011_310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Brindusa Covaci (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ffuspro.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.