IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ris/sphedp/2010_025.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impozitare Progresiva Sau Cota Unica?

Author

Listed:
  • Padurean, Elena

    (Academia Romana, Centrul de Cercetari Financiare si Monetare Victor Slavescu)

  • Catarama, Delia

    (Academia Romana, Centrul de Cercetari Financiare si Monetare Victor Slavescu)

Abstract

Daca ne gândim la România, o tara cu o administratie dificila, cu multiple proceduri birocratice inutile, cu o mare evaziune fiscala, nu putem sa nu încercam o comparatie a celor doua tipuri de impozitare a veniturilor, mai ales prin efectele pe care acestea le au asupra contribuabilului, dar si asupra bugetului de stat. Cota unica de impozitare are o serie de avantaje si introducerea ei a fost sustinuta în mare parte de analistii economici ai Societatii Academice din România. Ei sustineau, înainte de introducerea cotei, ca, odata aplicata, aceasta metoda de impozitare ar ajunge sa aduca mai multi bani pentru buget, dar si o stare de echitate sociala. Au existat si exista înca argumente pro si contra cotei unice de impozitare.

Suggested Citation

  • Padurean, Elena & Catarama, Delia, 2010. "Impozitare Progresiva Sau Cota Unica?," Papers 2010/25, Osterreichish-Rumanischer Akademischer Verein.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:sphedp:2010_025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://mihaicovaci.intercer.org/site/37/images/padurean5.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    impozitare progresiva; cota unica;

    JEL classification:

    • A11 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Role of Economics; Role of Economists

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:sphedp:2010_025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Brindusa Covaci (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ffuspro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.