IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ris/kietrp/2023_013.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The End of "Second Globalization" and Implications for the Korean Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Kang, Duyong

    (Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade)

Abstract

Insofar as we define globalization as the consistent growth in the volume of global trade relative to world GDP, we reasonably conclude that the second phase of globalization, which lasted for five decades since the signing of the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs (GATT) in 1947, effectively ended with the global financial crisis of 2007-2008. Anti-globalization sentiment has taken root in many advanced countries since the global financial crisis and has conspired with an intensifying US-China rivalry to stem the erstwhile growth in trade relative to world GDP. The United States, the onetime champion of postwar globalization, has recently embraced a New Washington Consensus that represents a sharp departure from the original of the 1990s, effectively putting an end to globalization. The end of globalization means an end to a chapter in the history of global trade. It remains to be seen how the post-globalization trade environment will evolve, but the fact that no single country can claim unchallenged hegemony over the global economy also leaves room for concerted actions from smaller countries. The end of globalization is particularly significant to Korea, which has achieved a remarkable economic transformation thanks to the success of an export-led growth strategy. But real export growth in Korea has consistently fallen below its economic growth rates over the last decade, and we can conclude that export-led growth is no longer viable for Korea. As a chief beneficiary of free trade and the world’s eighth-largest trading country, Korea has practical interests, a moral obligation, and the potential to help ameliorate worsening global trade conditions. By making it known that the fragmentation of the global economy is not in its interest, Korea ought to partner with countries that share the same perspective and mobilize international support toward maintaining an open, non-discriminatory, and free trade order against protectionist and fragmenting forces. Expressing and maintaining a commitment to free trade can also help Korea minimize the impact to its economy of the eventual US-China decoupling. Thank you for reading this abstract of a report from the Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade! Visit us on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q36v30l5CV0 Visit us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/worldkiet/ Visit our website: http://www.kiet.re.kr/en

Suggested Citation

  • Kang, Duyong, 2023. "The End of "Second Globalization" and Implications for the Korean Economy," Research Papers 23/13, Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:kietrp:2023_013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4612154
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    free trade; globalization; anti-globalization; protectionism; economic nationalism; economic security; exports; US-China conflict; Korea;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F01 - International Economics - - General - - - Global Outlook
    • F02 - International Economics - - General - - - International Economic Order and Integration
    • F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General
    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • F52 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - National Security; Economic Nationalism
    • O20 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - General
    • O21 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Planning Models; Planning Policy
    • O24 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Trade Policy; Factor Movement; Foreign Exchange Policy
    • O25 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Industrial Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:kietrp:2023_013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aaron Crossen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/kiettkr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.