IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ris/kietrp/2023_009.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

China's Bid for Supremacy in Chips and Batteries: Implications for Korean Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Cho, Eun Kyo

    (Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade)

Abstract

Acute tensions persist between the United States and China, and nowhere is this more evident that in the field of cutting-edge technologies and industries. Washington has expanded semiconductor sanctions against China while major European countries have sought to reduce their exposure to China-based supply chains. Beijing has responded in kind by imposing restrictions on exports of key raw materials. China’s efforts to curtail exports are not only a retaliatory response to US sanctions, but they are also a crucial part of China’s long-term strategy to strengthen its supply chains for its cutting-edge industries. China is reinforcing its existing strengths in semiconductor and battery production and internalizing core technologies in an effort to establish self-a sufficient supply chain ecosystem. Beijing, in other words, is increasing its long-term investments in core technology R&D to reduce reliance on foreign sources, while giving given primacy to domestic sources of raw materials. It is also leveraging its production capacity, price competitiveness, and large domestic consumer market to its advantage. Chinese firms are competitors with Korean peers in key industries such semiconductors, batteries, and others. Critically, Korean industries depend upon China for critical materials and parts. It is therefore crucial that Korean policymakers not only to respond to China’s intensifying export controls, but also to establish a comprehensive and long-term industrial policy that can navigate China’s supply chain strategy. To that end, Korean must stay abreast of China’s evolving policies designed to foster its own cutting-edge industries and technologies and implement measures to prevent China from recruiting Korean experts. Korean needs to proactively address Chinese measures to lead next-generation technologies and markets by establishing more self-sufficient ecosystems for emerging technologies in the Korean semiconductor and battery industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Cho, Eun Kyo, 2023. "China's Bid for Supremacy in Chips and Batteries: Implications for Korean Policy," Research Papers 23/9, Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:kietrp:2023_009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4612250
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    US-China conflict; Chinese industry; Chinese technology; intellectual property; technological competitiveness; supply chains; supply chain strategy; semiconductors; batteries; chips; next-generation technology; technological development; economic security;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F02 - International Economics - - General - - - International Economic Order and Integration
    • F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General
    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • F50 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - General
    • F51 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Conflicts; Negotiations; Sanctions
    • F52 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - National Security; Economic Nationalism
    • L60 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - General
    • L63 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Microelectronics; Computers; Communications Equipment
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • O34 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:kietrp:2023_009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aaron Crossen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/kiettkr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.