IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ris/adbewp/0463.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessing Mandated Credit Programs: Case Study of the Magna Carta in the Philippines

Author

Listed:
  • Khor, Niny

    (Asian Development Bank)

  • Jacildo, Ryan

    (Consultant at the Economic Research and Regional Cooperation Department, ADB)

  • Tacneng, Ruth

    (Universidade Catolica Portuguesa)

Abstract

We examine the effects of a mandated credit program to small and medium enterprises in the Philippines (Magna Carta Law) using a panel dataset compiled from official data published by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas. The final sample of 109 financial institutions represented over 90% of total finance sector assets in the Philippines. We highlight three important findings. First, although the total lending levels to micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) grew slightly, the percentage shares of loans allocated to MSMEs declined drastically from a peak of 30% of total loans in 2002 to 16.4% in 2010. Second, following the upwards revision of the loan target (from 6% to 8%) for smaller firms in 2008, there was a sharp increase in noncompliance especially amongst universal and commercial banks. Kernel density estimates suggest that the revision of the Magna Carta in 2008 was binding for small firm lending particularly for the universal and commercial banks. On the other hand, total loans to medium enterprises were still more than threefold larger than the targeted 2%. Third, there is an increased heterogeneity in optimal loan portfolio across banks. Most surprisingly, the absolute level of MSME lending by rural and cooperative banks declined since 2008. Direct compliance amongst universal and commercial banks decreased beginning in the late 2007, while that of thrift banks increased to almost 100%. Abolishing the Magna Carta targets for medium-sized enterprise loans would most likely yield little adverse effects. Meanwhile, efforts to improve financial access to MSMEs should focus on alternative nondistortionary ways to increase financing supply, such as improving institutional framework for informational availability and development of equity and bond markets for MSMEs.

Suggested Citation

  • Khor, Niny & Jacildo, Ryan & Tacneng, Ruth, 2015. "Assessing Mandated Credit Programs: Case Study of the Magna Carta in the Philippines," ADB Economics Working Paper Series 463, Asian Development Bank.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:adbewp:0463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.adb.org/publications/assessing-mandated-credit-programs-magna-carta-philippines
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Milo, Melanie S. & Pasadilla, Gloria, 2005. "Effect of Liberalization on Banking Competition," Discussion Papers DP 2005-03, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    2. Mr. Jean-Claude Nascimento, 1990. "The Crisis in the Financial Sector and the Authorities' Reaction: The Case of the Philippines," IMF Working Papers 1990/026, International Monetary Fund.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ilmiawan Auwalin, 2021. "The effect of a credit policy change on microenterprise upward transition and growth: evidence from Indonesia," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(4), pages 611-636, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaminsky, Graciela Laura & Schmukler, Sergio L., 2002. "Short-run pain, long-run gain : the effects of financial liberalization," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2912, The World Bank.
    2. Luc Can & Mohamed Ariff, 2009. "Performance of East Asian banking sectors under IMF-supported programs," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 5-26.
    3. R. O. Odenu Iyede & Felix. E. Onah & Cletus. C. Agu, 2018. "A Survey of Studies on Money Demand and Inflation Amidst Banking Crisis," Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research, Scientific Publishing Institute, vol. 2(2), pages 34-54.
    4. K.C. Fung, 2007. "Service trade liberalization as a development opportunity - the role for the World Trade Organization," STUDIES IN TRADE AND INVESTMENT, in: Mia Mikic (ed.), FUTURE TRADE RESEARCH AREAS THAT MATTER TO DEVELOPING COUNTRY POLICYMAKERS, volume 61, chapter 3, pages 67-82, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
    5. Ivana Blažková & Gabriela Chmelíková, 2016. "The Influence of Market Concentration on the Development of Newly Born Businesses in the Czech Republic," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 64(3), pages 929-938.
    6. John K. Dadzie & Alessandra Ferrari, 2019. "Deregulation, efficiency and competition in developing banking markets: Do reforms really work? A case study for Ghana," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(4), pages 328-340, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    financial inclusion; financial markets; financial policy; Philippines; SME; targeted lending;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • O16 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Financial Markets; Saving and Capital Investment; Corporate Finance and Governance

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:adbewp:0463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Orlee Velarde (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eradbph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.