IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rim/rimwps/18-05.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Fama 3 and Fama 5 factor models under a machine learning framework

Author

Listed:
  • Periklis Gogas

    (Department of Economics, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece; Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis)

  • Theofilos Papadimitriou

    (Department of Economics, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece)

  • Dimitrios Karagkiozis

    (Department of Economics, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece)

Abstract

We examine four empirical models which are popular in money and stock markets world. These models are Fama – French 3 & 5 factors model, the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and the Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) model. These tools are intensively used by investors and market professionals as an important part of the investment decision process and for the evaluation of the applied investment strategies. The last years, several surveys and studies have done, and various methodologies were implemented to evaluate the effectiveness of these four models. The methodological approach of the current thesis focuses on the Support Vector Regression (SVR). This method is running in comparison with the Ordinary Least Squares linear regression.

Suggested Citation

  • Periklis Gogas & Theofilos Papadimitriou & Dimitrios Karagkiozis, 2018. "The Fama 3 and Fama 5 factor models under a machine learning framework," Working Paper series 18-05, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    • Handle: RePEc:rim:rimwps:18-05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rcea.org/RePEc/pdf/wp18-05.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fama, Eugene F & French, Kenneth R, 1992. "The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 47(2), pages 427-465, June.
    2. Banz, Rolf W., 1981. "The relationship between return and market value of common stocks," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 3-18, March.
    3. Fama, Eugene F & French, Kenneth R, 1996. "The CAPM Is Wanted, Dead or Alive," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 51(5), pages 1947-1958, December.
    4. Plakandaras, Vasilios & Papadimitriou, Theophilos & Gogas, Periklis & Diamantaras, Konstantinos, 2015. "Market sentiment and exchange rate directional forecasting," Algorithmic Finance, IOS Press, vol. 4(1-2), pages 69-79.
    5. Eugene F. Fama & Kenneth R. French, 2004. "The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and Evidence," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 18(3), pages 25-46, Summer.
    6. Bartholdy, Jan & Peare, Paula, 2005. "Estimation of expected return: CAPM vs. Fama and French," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 407-427.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Mayer-Foulkes, 2018. "Efficient Urbanization for Mexican Development," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(10), pages 1-1, October.
    2. Pedro M. Mirete-Ferrer & Alberto Garcia-Garcia & Juan Samuel Baixauli-Soler & Maria A. Prats, 2022. "A Review on Machine Learning for Asset Management," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-46, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pasaribu, Rowland Bismark Fernando, 2010. "Pemilihan Model Asset Pricing [Asset pricing model selection: Indonesian Stock Exchange]," MPRA Paper 36978, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain & Zakaria, Muhammad & Raza, Naveed, 2014. "Sensitivity Analysis of CAPM Estimates: Data Frequency and Time Frame," MPRA Paper 60110, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Babak Jafarizadeh & Reidar B. Bratvold, 2019. "Exploration economics: taking opportunities and the risk of double-counting risk," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 32(3), pages 323-335, November.
    4. Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad & Saniya Khalid & Saba Ameer, 2016. "CAPM estimates: Can data frequency and time period lend a hand?," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(02), pages 1-12, June.
    5. David J. Moore & David McMillan, 2016. "A look at the actual cost of capital of US firms," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1233628-123, December.
    6. Turan G. Bali & Robert F. Engle & Yi Tang, 2017. "Dynamic Conditional Beta Is Alive and Well in the Cross Section of Daily Stock Returns," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(11), pages 3760-3779, November.
    7. Paulo Alves, 2013. "The Fama French Model or the Capital Asset Pricing Model: International Evidence," The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 7(2), pages 79-89.
    8. Mahfuza Khatun & K. M. Zahidul Islam, 2022. "“Beta†with “Size Premium†an Augmented Approach in the Frontier Equity Market: Evidence from Dhaka Stock Exchange," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 1-5.
    9. Dragos Stefan Oprea, 2015. "The Interval Effect in Estimating Beta: Empirical Evidence from the Romanian Stock Market," The Review of Finance and Banking, Academia de Studii Economice din Bucuresti, Romania / Facultatea de Finante, Asigurari, Banci si Burse de Valori / Catedra de Finante, vol. 7(2), pages 016-025, December.
    10. Apergis, Nicholas & Payne, James E., 2014. "Resurrecting the size effect: Evidence from a panel nonlinear cointegration model for the G7 stock markets," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 46-53.
    11. Janick Christian Mollet & Andreas Ziegler, 2012. "Is Socially Responsible Investing Really Beneficial? New Empirical Evidence for the US and European Stock Markets," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201228, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    12. Robert D. Coleman, 2006. "Asset Pricing Simultaneities: Phases and Patterns," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 7(1), pages 49-76, May.
    13. Winkler, Julian, 2024. "Changing preferences as a source of stock return variation," MPRA Paper 122802, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Ziegler, Andreas & Busch, Timo & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2011. "Disclosed corporate responses to climate change and stock performance: An international empirical analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 1283-1294.
    15. Chang, Chiao-Yi, 2011. "The relationship between the 52-week high of an individual stock and stock market index level: Evidence from Taiwan," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 14-27, February.
    16. Jiri Novak, 2015. "Systematic Risk Changes, Negative Realized Excess Returns and Time-Varying CAPM Beta," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 65(2), pages 167-190, April.
    17. Qianwei Ying & Tahir Yousaf & Qurat ul Ain & Yasmeen Akhtar & Muhammad Shahid Rasheed, 2019. "Stock Investment and Excess Returns: A Critical Review in the Light of the Efficient Market Hypothesis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, June.
    18. Tang, Gordon Y. N. & Shum, Wai Cheong, 2004. "The risk-return relations in the Singapore stock market," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 179-195, April.
    19. Martin Wallmeier, 2000. "Determinanten erwarteter Renditen am deutschen Aktienmarkt — Eine empirische Untersuchung anhand ausgewählter Kennzahlen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 27-57, February.
    20. Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad, 2015. "Multiscale Systematic Risk: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan," International Journal of Economics and Empirical Research (IJEER), The Economics and Social Development Organization (TESDO), vol. 3(12), pages 605-615, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    stock markets; stock returns; machine learning; support vector regression;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F31 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - Foreign Exchange
    • F37 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - International Finance Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications
    • C45 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Neural Networks and Related Topics
    • C5 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rim:rimwps:18-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marco Savioli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rcfeait.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.