IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/red/sed019/1535.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Road Network Centralization, Political Institutions, and Conflict

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Alder

    (University of North Carolina at Chapel H)

  • Illenin Kondo

    (Notre Dame)

  • Leonard Wantchekon

    (Princeton University)

Abstract

We study how the topology of road networks affects political institutions and the incidence of conflict. Using a global geo-coded data set of roads and cities, we first compute the degree of road network centralization for each country. This measure captures the disproportionate centrality of a few cities in a country's road network. We also use the slope of the terrain as a determinant of the network's bilateral paths and travel times. We then relate the network centralization measures to three sets of political and economic outcomes: (i) fiscal centralization variables such as the central government's share of total government revenue and expenditures relative to local and state governments; (ii) the incidence of internal conflicts, and (iii) political fragmentation measured by the prevalence of regional political parties. Our preliminary results show that countries with a more centralized road network tend to have a larger central government share in their overall government finances. Furthermore, higher centralization is associated with more internal conflict and a more regionally-fragmented political system. The evidence suggests that the configuration of the road network across a country's cities shapes its institutional characteristics and affects key political outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Alder & Illenin Kondo & Leonard Wantchekon, 2019. "Road Network Centralization, Political Institutions, and Conflict," 2019 Meeting Papers 1535, Society for Economic Dynamics.
  • Handle: RePEc:red:sed019:1535
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed019:1535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christian Zimmermann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sedddea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.