IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/red/sed012/1170.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Policy Discretion under Persistent Shocks

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Yared

    (Columbia University)

Abstract

This paper analyzes the optimal level of discretion in policymaking. Our application is a dynamic fiscal policy model in which the government has a present-bias towards public spending. Society trades off its desire to allow the government to react to its private information about the state of the economy against its desire to prevent the government from engaging in excessive spending. In contrast to previous research, we allow the government's private information to be persistent. We consider the optimal fiscal rules implied by this mechanism design problem. We present three main results which emerge only when private information is persistent. First, the optimal mechanism admits rules which are ex-post suboptimal for social welfare. Second, the optimal rules depend not only on payoff-relevant states, but on the entire history of realized states. Finally, the optimal rule is not a government spending limit. Motivated by these results, we develop a definition of renegotiation-proof mechanisms and show that the optimal renegotiation-proof mechanism is a state-dependent spending limit.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Yared, 2012. "Policy Discretion under Persistent Shocks," 2012 Meeting Papers 1170, Society for Economic Dynamics.
  • Handle: RePEc:red:sed012:1170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://red-files-public.s3.amazonaws.com/meetpapers/2012/paper_1170.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed012:1170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christian Zimmermann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sedddea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.