IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/red/sed011/565.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Competitive Equilibrium in Asset Markets with Adverse Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Shimer

    (University of Chicago)

  • Veronica Guerrieri

    (University of Chicago)

Abstract

We develop a theory of equilibrium in asset markets with adverse selection. Traders can buy and sell an asset at any price. Sellers recognize that their trades may be rationed if they ask for a high price, while buyers recognize that they can only get a high quality good by paying a high price. These beliefs are consistent with rational behavior by the traders on the other side of the market. In the resulting equilibrium, the existence of low-quality assets reduces the liquidity and price-dividend ratio in the market for high quality assets. A larger player who purchases and destroys all the low quality assets will improve the liquidity and raise the price-dividend ratio for the remaining assets.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Shimer & Veronica Guerrieri, 2011. "Competitive Equilibrium in Asset Markets with Adverse Selection," 2011 Meeting Papers 565, Society for Economic Dynamics.
  • Handle: RePEc:red:sed011:565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kyungmin Kim & Benjamin Lester & Braz Camargo, 2012. "Subsidizing Price Discovery," 2012 Meeting Papers 338, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    2. Jonathan Chiu & Thorsten V. Koeppl, 2016. "Trading Dynamics with Adverse Selection and Search: Market Freeze, Intervention and Recovery," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 83(3), pages 969-1000.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed011:565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christian Zimmermann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sedddea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.