IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rdg/repxwp/rep-wp2008-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Change, Rigidity & Delay in the UK System of Land-use Development Control

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Ball

    (Department of Real Estate & Planning, University of Reading Business School)

  • Phil Allmendinger

Abstract

The British system of development control is time-consuming and uncertain in outcome. Moreover, it is becoming increasingly overloaded as it has gradually switched away from being centred on a traditional 'is it an appropriate land-use?' type approach to one based on multi-faceted inspections of projects and negotiations over the distribution of the potential financial gains arising from them. Recent policy developments have centred on improving the operation of development control. This paper argues that more fundamental issues may be a stake as well. Important market changes have increased workloads. Furthermore, the UK planning system's institutional framework encourages change to move in specific directions, which is not always helpful. If expectations of increased long-term housing supply are to be met more substantial changes to development control may be essential but hard to achieve.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Ball & Phil Allmendinger, 2008. "Change, Rigidity & Delay in the UK System of Land-use Development Control," Real Estate & Planning Working Papers rep-wp2008-15, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
  • Handle: RePEc:rdg:repxwp:rep-wp2008-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.henley.reading.ac.uk/rep/fulltxt/1508.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miguel Coelho & Sebastian Dellepiane-Avellaneda & Vigyan Ratnoo, 2017. "The political economy of housing in England," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 31-60, January.
    2. ., 2014. "Planning and economic performance," Chapters, in: Urban Economics and Urban Policy, chapter 5, pages 104-126, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rdg:repxwp:rep-wp2008-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marie Pearson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bsrdguk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.