IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rdg/ibhxdp/ibh-dp2016-01.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The introduction of the joint-stock company in English banking and monetary policy

Author

Listed:
  • Victoria Barnes

    (Georgetown University Law Center)

  • Lucy Newton

    (Henley Business School, University of Reading)

Abstract

Following the passage of the 1826 Act, the joint-stock bank entered the English banking system and its dominance over the private bank is often thought to be a result of laissez-faire political ideology. This article shows that banking and monetary policy in the nineteenth century was far from liberal or permissive as regulators legislated with a clear idea of the intended outcomes of their actions. Yet, as policy-makers were often unsuccessful in their attempts to introduce change in the banking system, they became interventionist in an effort to rectify their mistakes. By placing regulation in its political context, we show that the emergence of a set of banks with shareholders, sleeping partners and investors as owners was both unexpected and unintentional. It reveals their subsequent attempt to repeal the 1826 Act and dissolve the offending companies through more legislation.

Suggested Citation

  • Victoria Barnes & Lucy Newton, 2016. "The introduction of the joint-stock company in English banking and monetary policy," International Business History Discussion Papers ibh-dp2016-01, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
  • Handle: RePEc:rdg:ibhxdp:ibh-dp2016-01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/assets.henley.ac.uk/legacyUploads/pdf/research/papers-publications/IBH-2016-01_Barnes_and_Newton.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Banks; nineteenth century; policy-making; legislation;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rdg:ibhxdp:ibh-dp2016-01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marie Pearson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bsrdguk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.