IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qmw/qmwecw/251.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Capacity and Competition: Empirical Evidence on UK Panel Data

Author

Abstract

Following D. Kreps and J. Scheinkman (1983), it is common to view the difference between Cournot and Bertrand competition as depending on production capacity. Bertrand undercutting is only feasible if firms have capacity to serve the market gained. If firms are capacity constrained, the Cournot model is more appropriate. This paper tests the capacity and competition idea by looking at the relationship between profits and capacity constraints; if capacity constrained firms become more Cournot-like, it should be positive. Using survey data on capacity constraints merged into a panel industry data set for the United Kingdom, the authors find a robust positive relationship. Copyright 1994 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • J.E. Haskel & C. Martin, 1992. "Capacity and Competition: Empirical Evidence on UK Panel Data," Working Papers 251, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
  • Handle: RePEc:qmw:qmwecw:251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.qmul.ac.uk
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qmw:qmwecw:251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nicholas Owen The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Nicholas Owen to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deqmwuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.