IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qed/wpaper/79.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Sensitivity of Quarterly Models of Wage Determination to Aggregation Assumptions

Author

Listed:
  • J.C.R. Rowley

    (Queen's University)

  • D.A. Wilton

    (Queen's University)

Abstract

In his A.E.A. Presidential Address, Tobin points out that due to the continuing controversy over the concept of a stable Phillips curve, the institutional features of the labour market have been largely ignored. Hence, the purpose of this paper is twofold: (1) to present an analytical framework for the empirical investigation of these institutional labour market features, and (2) to present some empirical results demonstrating the gravity of the problem.

Suggested Citation

  • J.C.R. Rowley & D.A. Wilton, 1972. "The Sensitivity of Quarterly Models of Wage Determination to Aggregation Assumptions," Working Paper 79, Economics Department, Queen's University.
  • Handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://qed.econ.queensu.ca/working_papers/papers/qed_wp_79.pdf
    File Function: First version 1972
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. J. C. R. Rowley & D. A. Wilton, 1973. "The Empirical Sensitivity of the Phillips Curve," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 17(2), pages 90-112, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Babcock (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.