IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qed/wpaper/520.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Compensation Principle and Cost Benefit Analysis: Consistency, Application and Decision Rule Error

Author

Listed:
  • Neil Bruce
  • Richard Harris

Abstract

Evaluating projects on the basis of aggregate (unweighted) costs and benefits is a wide spread practice in cost-benefit analysis. This practice continues despite serious flaws in the "compensation principle", which is the usual welfare theoretic basis to justify the procedure. For this reason we examine precise conditions under which projects can be evaluated in terms of aggregate costs and benefits. We also examine the direction of the bias or decision rule error that will be encountered when the required conditions are not satisfied.

Suggested Citation

  • Neil Bruce & Richard Harris, 1982. "The Compensation Principle and Cost Benefit Analysis: Consistency, Application and Decision Rule Error," Working Paper 520, Economics Department, Queen's University.
    • Handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Babcock (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.