IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qed/wpaper/48.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Factors Influencing Career Choices of Students: An Empirical Examination of Some Aspects of the Neoclassical Theory of Choice in Labour Markets

Author

Listed:
  • David A.Dodge

    (Queen's University)

  • Neil M. Swan

    (Queen's University)

Abstract

The factors which motivate a student to choose a particular career are many; the process of career choice is a complex one. Psychologists and sociologists stress the importance of factors such as need for achievement, peer group attitudes, family background, and cultural norms in their explanations of the choice process. Economists take these factors as given, and examine instead the relative importance of the econmic costs and benefits in the determination of career choice. The general purpose of this paper is to ascertain whether the assumptions of the economist's model are appplicable to the process of choice of career.

Suggested Citation

  • David A.Dodge & Neil M. Swan, 1971. "Factors Influencing Career Choices of Students: An Empirical Examination of Some Aspects of the Neoclassical Theory of Choice in Labour Markets," Working Paper 48, Economics Department, Queen's University.
  • Handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:48
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://qed.econ.queensu.ca/working_papers/papers/qed_wp_48.pdf
    File Function: First version 1971
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lemelin, Clément & Otis, Jean-Claude, 1978. "La théorie économique des choix de carrière : une interprétation et une vérification empirique," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 54(3), pages 337-354, juillet.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Babcock (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.