IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qed/dpaper/198.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cost-Benefit Analysis for Investment Decisions: Chapter 5 (Scale, Timing, Length and Inter-Dependencies in Project Selection)

Author

Listed:
  • Glenn Jenkins

    (Queen's University, Canada and Eastern Mediterranean University, Cyprus)

  • Chun-Yan Kuo

    (Queen's University, Canada)

  • Arnold C. Harberger

    (University of California, Los Angeles, USA)

Abstract

It is generally agreed that a project's net present value (NPV) is the most important criterion for the financial and the economic evaluation of a project from either the owner's or economic perspective. The NPV criterion requires that a project analyst recommend only projects with positive NPV. The next step is to endeavor to maximize the NPV. The reason for trying to maximize the NPV is to extract as much value from the project as possible. Ideally, we should strive to maximize the NPV of incremental net cash flows or net economic benefits. Of course, optimization cannot be pursued blindly; there may be repercussions for other stakeholders that need to be considered in the final decision making. There are other important considerations project analysts often encounter. These considerations include changes in project parameters like the scale of investment, the date of initiation of a project, the length of project life or interdependencies of project components. Each of them is addressed in this chapter by using the criterion of a project's net present value. This chapter explains how project analysts use the criterion of a project's net present value to make such decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Glenn Jenkins & Chun-Yan Kuo & Arnold C. Harberger, 2011. "Cost-Benefit Analysis for Investment Decisions: Chapter 5 (Scale, Timing, Length and Inter-Dependencies in Project Selection)," Development Discussion Papers 2011-05, JDI Executive Programs.
  • Handle: RePEc:qed:dpaper:198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cri-world.com/publications/qed_dp_198.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yurtsev, Arif & Jenkins, Glenn P., 2016. "Cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative water heater systems operating with unreliable water supplies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 174-183.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Project Selecting; Economic Evaluation; Financial Evaluation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H43 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:dpaper:198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Babcock (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.