IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pur/prukra/1341.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Learning Under Compound Risk vs. Learning Under Ambiguity - An Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Othon M. Moreno
  • Yaroslav Rosokha

Abstract

We design and conduct an economic experiment to investigate the learning process of agents under compound risk and under ambiguity. We gather data for subjects choosing between lotteries involving risky and ambiguous urns. Agents make decisions in conjunction with a sequence of random draws with replacement, allowing us to estimate the agents' beliefs at different moments in time. For each type of urn, we estimate a behavioral model for which the standard Bayesian updating model is a particular case. Our findings suggest an important dierence in updating behavior between risky and ambiguous environments. Specically, even after controlling for the initial prior, we find that when learning under ambiguity, subjects signicantly overweight the new signal, while when learning under compound risk, subjects are essentially Bayesian.

Suggested Citation

  • Othon M. Moreno & Yaroslav Rosokha, 2016. "Learning Under Compound Risk vs. Learning Under Ambiguity - An Experiment," Purdue University Economics Working Papers 1341, Purdue University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:pur:prukra:1341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://business.purdue.edu/research/working-papers-series/2024/1341.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Belief Formation; Learning; Baysian Updating; Ambiguity; Experiments;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pur:prukra:1341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Business PHD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/kspurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.