IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pri/indrel/314.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Comparison of Formal and Informal Dispute Resolution in Medical Malpractice

Author

Listed:
  • Henry S. Farber

    (Princeton University)

  • Michelle J. White

    (University of Michigan)

Abstract

In this study we examine the experience of a single large hospital with an informal pre-litigation complaint process that resolves some cases outside of the legal system. The empirical results are generally consistent with an information structure where patients are poorly informed about the quality of medical care and the hospital does not know whether particular patients are litigious or not. The complaint process seems to resolve many complaints in a less costly manner than filing lawsuits. Almost half of all complaints are resolved before a lawsuit is filed. The large majority of these are dropped, and they are cases that would likely have been dropped even if they had been initiated as lawsuits. Very few cases are settled with a cash payment to patients before a lawsuit is filed, suggesting that patients must file lawsuits in order to convince the hospital that they are litigious enough to justify a settlement. Cases initiated through the complaint process are not resolved (dropped, settled, tried to a verdict) significantly differently from cases initiated as lawsuits, controlling for observable case characteristics. When settlements of lawsuits occur, the amounts paid do not vary depending on how the case originated, but settlements of complaints are much higher for cases settled after a lawsuit is filed. We conclude that the complaint process is a cost-effective front-end for the litigation process that provides information to patients regarding the quality of their medical care and, hence, the likelihood of negligence.

Suggested Citation

  • Henry S. Farber & Michelle J. White, 1993. "A Comparison of Formal and Informal Dispute Resolution in Medical Malpractice," Working Papers 693, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section..
    • Handle: RePEc:pri:indrel:314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dataspace.princeton.edu/bitstream/88435/dsp01g732d898w/1/314.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    medical malpractice; litigation; dispute resolution;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C0 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pri:indrel:314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bobray Bordelon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/irprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.