IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/98655.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

دراسة اقتصادية تحليلية لكفاءة استخدام أنماط الري الحديثة: دراسة ميدانية بمزارع منطقة القصيم
[An analytical economic study for the efficiency of water resources use in irrigation, “A field study at Al-Qassim region”]

Author

Listed:
  • El-Rasoul, Ahmed Abou El-Yazid
  • alomar, Ibrahim Saleh

Abstract

The study aims to estimate the efficiency of water resources use for irrigation at Al-Qassim farms by estimating the productivity and technical efficiency, under different irrigation methods (sprinkler and drip irrigation) used for the main crops which are included in the sample of study, and estimating the demand functions for resources used in the production of main crops. The analysis based on the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), in addition to Total Factor Productivity (TFP) and parametric programming. The DEA is used with the constant and variant returns to scale (CRS and VRS) to estimate the technical efficiency and scale efficiency of the considered crops under different irrigation methods. The study sample (consists of 124 farms) was selected from the farms at Al-Qassim region, Data collected by the personal interview through a questionnaire which was prepared for this purpose, the study sample were representative the most important field and vegetable crops at the study area. The most important findings of the study can summarize as follows: (1) By estimation the technical (TE) and scale efficiency (SE) for the field and vegetable crops at the study sample according to the concept of VRS and CRS under different irrigation methods, the results show the following: * According to CRS hypothesis the average technical efficiency (TE) under mobile sprinkler irrigation method were lower for farms of wheat, barley, winter tomatoes, corn, summer tomatoes and alfalfa, while results refers to improvement of (TE) for these crops according to VRS hypothesis. * The average of scale efficiency (SE), which is (SE=TECRS / TEVRS) amounted to about 0.91, 0.89, 0.90, 0.91, 0.90, 0.90 under the mobile sprinkler irrigation system for the farms of wheat, barley, winter tomatoes, corn, summer tomatoes and summer cucumber. * According to CRS hypothesis the average technical efficiency (TE) under drip irrigation method were lower for farms of zucchini, winter tomatoes, winter cucumber, summer potatoes, summer tomatoes and summer cucumbers, while results refers to improvement of (TE) for these crops according to VRS hypothesis. * The average of scale efficiency (SE), was to about 0.86, 0.94, 0.83, 0.94, 0.94, 0.86 under the drip irrigation system for the farms of zucchini, winter tomatoes, winter cucumber, summer potatoes, summer tomatoes and summer cucumber. (2) The change in the index of total factor productivity (TFP Ch) of the quantity of production for winter tomatoes and summer tomatoes as a shift from the mobile sprinkler system to the drip system about 119%, 112% and refers to an opportunity to increase efficiency by 19%, 12%, while the change in the index of total factor productivity (TFP Ch) of the value of production for alfalfa as a shift from the fixed sprinkler system to the mobile sprinkler system about 103%. (3) By estimating the production and economic efficiencies based on stochastic frontier Analysis (SFA) using the ordinary least square (OLS) method and the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) method. The (MLE) method was used under both the Truncated Distribution (TD) and Half-Normal Distribution (HND) techniques. The results indicated to the preference of MLE method in case of (HND) according to significance of γ to estimate the production efficiency of wheat, zucchini and alfalfa. While MLE method in case of (TD) according to significance of γ and the highest value of the LR was the best for crops winter and summer tomatoes, and winter and summer cucumbers. The OLS method was the fit to estimate the production efficiency of barley, corn and summer potatoes. (4) Using the parametric programming to identify the value of the marginal productivity (shadow prices) for each of the nitrogenous, phosphate fertilizers, agricultural employment and water resources. The results indicated that the shadow price of the unit (50 kg) for the resource of phosphate fertilizer up to about 69.1 SAR at the optimal use of the resource in the production of winter crops which follows the mobile sprinkler irrigation system, while up to about 131.3 SAR at the optimal use of the resource in the production of summer crops. For the resource of nitrogenous fertilizers used in the production of winter crops which follows the mobile sprinkler irrigation system, the shadow price of the unit (50 kg) up to about 295.4 SAR and up to about 68.7 SAR for the summer crops. For the labor resource used in the production of winter crops which follows the mobile sprinkler irrigation system, the shadow price of the unit (man / day) is approximately 52.3 SAR at the optimum utilization of the resource, while up to about 47.5 SAR to produce the summer crops.

Suggested Citation

  • El-Rasoul, Ahmed Abou El-Yazid & alomar, Ibrahim Saleh, 2012. "دراسة اقتصادية تحليلية لكفاءة استخدام أنماط الري الحديثة: دراسة ميدانية بمزارع منطقة القصيم [An analytical economic study for the efficiency of water resources use in irrigation, “A field study at ," MPRA Paper 98655, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:98655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/98655/1/MPRA_paper_98655.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helfand, Steven M. & Levine, Edward S., 2004. "Farm size and the determinants of productive efficiency in the Brazilian Center-West," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 31(2-3), pages 241-249, December.
    2. Kurkalova, Lyubov A. & Jensen, Helen H., 1998. "Technical Efficiency Of Grain Production In Ukraine," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20974, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    4. Meeusen, Wim & van den Broeck, Julien, 1977. "Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 18(2), pages 435-444, June.
    5. Mao, Weining & Koo, Won W., 1996. "Productivity Growth, Technology Progress, And Efficiency Change In Chinese Agricultural Production From 1984 To 1993," Agricultural Economics Reports 23442, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    6. Chen, Adam Zhuo & Huffman, Wallace E. & Rozelle, Scott, 2003. "Technical Efficiency of Chinese Grain Production: A Stochastic Production Frontier Approach," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 271497, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    7. Battese, G E & Coelli, T J, 1995. "A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 325-332.
    8. Ali, Agha Iqbal & Lerme, Catherine S. & Seiford, Lawrence M., 1995. "Components of efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 462-473, February.
    9. Koo, Won W. & Taylor, Richard D., 1999. "An Economic Analysis Of Producing Carrots In The Red River Valley," Agricultural Economics Reports 23123, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    10. Serrao, Amilcar, 2003. "Agricultural Productivity Analysis Of European Union And Eastern Regions," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22167, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. André Croppenstedt, 2005. "Measuring Technical Efficiency of Wheat Farmers in Egypt," Working Papers 05-06, Agricultural and Development Economics Division of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO - ESA).
    12. Croppenstedt, André, 2005. "Measuring technical efficiency of wheat farmers in Egypt," ESA Working Papers 289072, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).
    13. Charnes, Abraham & Cooper, William W. & Li, Shanling, 1989. "Using data envelopment analysis to evaluate efficiency in the economic performance of Chinese cities," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 325-344.
    14. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    15. Ajibefun, Igbekele A., 2002. "Analysis of Policy Issues in Technical Efficiency of Small Scale Farmers Using the Stochastic Frontier Production Function: With Application to Nigerian Farmers," 13th Congress, Wageningen, The Netherlands, July 7-12, 2002 7015, International Farm Management Association.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Francesca Cracolici & Peter Nijkamp & Piet Rietveld, 2008. "Assessment of Tourism Competitiveness by Analysing Destination Efficiency," Tourism Economics, , vol. 14(2), pages 325-342, June.
    2. António Afonso & Ana Patricia Montes & José M. Domínguez, 2024. "Measuring Tax Burden Efficiency in OECD Countries: An International Comparison," CESifo Working Paper Series 11333, CESifo.
    3. Thanh Ngo & Kan Wai Hong Tsui, 2022. "Estimating the confidence intervals for DEA efficiency scores of Asia-Pacific airlines," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3411-3434, September.
    4. Sickles, Robin C. & Song, Wonho & Zelenyuk, Valentin, 2018. "Econometric Analysis of Productivity: Theory and Implementation in R," Working Papers 18-008, Rice University, Department of Economics.
    5. Chien-Ming Chen & Magali A. Delmas & Marvin B. Lieberman, 2015. "Production frontier methodologies and efficiency as a performance measure in strategic management research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 19-36, January.
    6. Seog-Chan Oh & Alfred J. Hildreth, 2014. "Estimating the Technical Improvement of Energy Efficiency in the Automotive Industry—Stochastic and Deterministic Frontier Benchmarking Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-27, September.
    7. Guillermo Jopen Sánchez, 2016. "Measuring Technical Efficiency in Primary Education: Evidences for Peruvian Case," Working Papers 77, Peruvian Economic Association.
    8. Salas-Velasco, Manuel, 2018. "Production efficiency measurement and its determinants across OECD countries: The role of business sophistication and innovation," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 60-73.
    9. Kalb, Alexander, 2009. "What determines local governments' technical efficiency? The case of road maintenance," ZEW Discussion Papers 09-047, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    10. Beniamina Margari & Fabrizio Erbetta & Carmelo Petraglia & Massimiliano Piacenza, 2007. "Regulatory and environmental effects on public transit efficiency: a mixed DEA-SFA approach," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 131-151, October.
    11. Galluzzo Nicola, 2020. "A Technical Efficiency Analysis of Financial Subsidies Allocated by the Cap in Romanian Farms Using Stochastic Frontier Analysis," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 12(4), pages 494-505, December.
    12. Varabyova, Yauheniya & Schreyögg, Jonas, 2013. "International comparisons of the technical efficiency of the hospital sector: Panel data analysis of OECD countries using parametric and non-parametric approaches," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 70-79.
    13. Silva, Thiago Christiano & Tabak, Benjamin Miranda & Cajueiro, Daniel Oliveira & Dias, Marina Villas Boas, 2018. "Adequacy of deterministic and parametric frontiers to analyze the efficiency of Indian commercial banks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 506(C), pages 1016-1025.
    14. Prakash, Navendu & Singh, Shveta & Sharma, Seema, 2021. "Technological diffusion, banking efficiency and Solow's paradox: A frontier-based parametric and non-parametric analysis," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 534-551.
    15. Madau, Fabio A., 2012. "Technical and scale efficiency in the Italian Citrus Farming: A comparison between Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) and Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA) Models," MPRA Paper 41403, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Jamasb, Tooraj & Llorca, Manuel & Khetrapal, Pavan & Thakur, Tripta, 2021. "Institutions and performance of regulated firms: Evidence from electricity distribution in India," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 68-82.
    17. Hayatullah Ahmadzai, 2017. "Crop Diversification and Technical Efficiency in Afghanistan: Stochastic Frontier Analysis," Discussion Papers 2017-04, University of Nottingham, CREDIT.
    18. Alexander Kalb, 2014. "What Determines Local Governments' Cost-efficiency? The Case of Road Maintenance," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(9), pages 1483-1498, September.
    19. Suyanto, & Salim, Ruhul & Bloch, Harry, 2014. "Which firms benefit from foreign direct investment? Empirical evidence from Indonesian manufacturing," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 16-29.
    20. Li, Hong-Zhou & Kopsakangas-Savolainen, Maria & Xiao, Xing-Zhi & Tian, Zhen-Zhen & Yang, Xiao-Yuan & Wang, Jian-Lin, 2016. "Cost efficiency of electric grid utilities in China: A comparison of estimates from SFA–MLE, SFA–Bayes and StoNED–CNLS," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 272-283.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Data Envelopment Analysis; TFP; Half Normal Distribution; Truncated Distribution;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q2 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation
    • Q25 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Water

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:98655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.