IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/97205.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Corporate Governance and Liquidity Risk of Coolpad Group Limited

Author

Listed:
  • Chaw, Chun Ho

Abstract

The study aims to measure corporate governance and its impact on company performance and the risk of Cool Group Limited. The research method is to use the SPSS System to perform regression analysis on Coolpad Group Limited. The study found that the liquidity performance of Cool Group Co., Ltd. has deteriorated year by year, which means that its ability to withstand short-term debt is deteriorating. Regression analysis shows that Coolpad Group's liquidity risk is more affected by the quick ratio, current ratio (internal factor) and interest rate (external factor).

Suggested Citation

  • Chaw, Chun Ho, 2019. "Corporate Governance and Liquidity Risk of Coolpad Group Limited," MPRA Paper 97205, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 Nov 2019.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:97205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/97205/1/MPRA_paper_97205.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davidson, RA & Gist, WE, 1996. "Empirical evidence on the functional relation between audit planning and total audit effort," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 111-124.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Herings, P.J.J. & Kubler, F., 2000. "Computing equilibria in finance economies," Research Memorandum 022, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    2. Nikos Vafeas & James Waegelein, 2007. "The association between audit committees, compensation incentives, and corporate audit fees," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 241-255, April.
    3. Rustam, Sehrish & Rashid, Kashif & Zaman, Khalid, 2013. "The relationship between audit committees, compensation incentives and corporate audit fees in Pakistan," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 697-716.
    4. Karen M. Y. Lai & Andriyawan Sasmita & Ferdinand A. Gul & Yee Boon Foo & Marion Hutchinson, 2018. "Busy Auditors, Ethical Behavior, and Discretionary Accruals Quality in Malaysia," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 1187-1198, July.
    5. Michael De Martinis & Hironori Fukukawa & Theodore J. Mock, 2011. "Exploring the role of country and client type on the auditor's client risk assessments and audit planning decisions," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 26(7), pages 543-565, July.
    6. Huh, Bong Gu & Lee, Sunhwa & Kim, Wonsin, 2021. "The impact of the input level of information system audit on the audit quality: Korean evidence," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    7. Schelleman, C.C.M. & Maijoor, S.J., 2000. "Benchmarking the production of audit services: an efficiency frontier approach," Research Memorandum 055, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    8. Karl Hackenbrack & W. Robert Knechel, 1997. "Resource Allocation Decisions in Audit Engagements," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 481-499, September.
    9. Timothy B. Bell & Rajib Doogar & Ira Solomon, 2008. "Audit Labor Usage and Fees under Business Risk Auditing," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 729-760, September.
    10. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    liquidity risk; macroeconomics and corporate governance;

    JEL classification:

    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • G33 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Bankruptcy; Liquidation
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:97205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.