IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/93301.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

ضوابط وأدوات تجاوب المؤسسات المالية الإسلامية مع المستجدات الاجتماعية
[The social responsibility of the Islamic financial institutions and its Shariah parameters]

Author

Listed:
  • Abozaid, Abdulazeem

Abstract

The Islamic financial institutions are criticized for failure to play their perceived role in terms of assuming social responsibility. They are expected, based on their inception philosophy, to contribute to the social welfare in the societies in which they operate and to the advancement of these societies. The study examines the validity of assuming these institutions some social responsibility, the different tools and vehicles through which these institutions can provide the desired social benefit, and the Shariah rules to carry out this role. The research concludes that Islamic financial institutions must assume some social responsibility in a manner that does not harm the very purpose for which they have been established. The fact that they fail to carry out their social responsibilities is often the result of administrative shortcomings in these institutions, in addition to the adoption of some controversial financing instruments that would defy and social good. The paper also proposes some vehicles through which Islamic financial institutions shall play a positive social role.

Suggested Citation

  • Abozaid, Abdulazeem, 2018. "ضوابط وأدوات تجاوب المؤسسات المالية الإسلامية مع المستجدات الاجتماعية [The social responsibility of the Islamic financial institutions and its Shariah parameters]," MPRA Paper 93301, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:93301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93301/3/MPRA_paper_93301.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social responsibility; Islamic banks; Islamic finance; corporate social responsibility;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K0 - Law and Economics - - General
    • P0 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - General
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:93301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.