IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/84988.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Przedsiębiorczość akademicka. Dobre praktyki
[Academic Entrepreneurship: Good Practices]

Author

Listed:
  • Plawgo, Bogusław
  • Klimczuk-Kochańska, Magdalena
  • Juchnicka, Marta
  • Citkowski, Mariusz

Abstract

Polish Abstract: Niniejsza publikacja jest zbiorem „dobrych praktyk" przedsiębiorczości akademickiej zidentyfi kowanych nie tylko w Polsce ale także w Stanach Zjednoczonych, Niemczech, Chinach, Szwajcarii, Belgii, Włoszech, Szwecji, Kanadadzie i Wielkiej Brytanii. Praktyki pochodzą z różnych sektorów gospodarki takich jak: biotechnologia, medycyna, farmacja, biofarmacja, elektronika i automatyka, półprzewodniki, nanotechnologia, elektronika, elektromechanika, analiza środowiskowa, informatyka, internet, multimedia i komunikacja. Wskazano także przykłady „przedsiębiorczych uniwersytetów", w przypadku których mamy do czynienia z świadomym nastawieniem całych społeczności akademickich na rozwój przedsiębiorczości w wielu sektorach gospodarczych jako podstawy własnej strategii rozwoju. Choć zaprezentowane przykłady mogą się wydawać odległe, to łączy je umiejętność przekuwania wiedzy generowanej w sferze nauki na sukcesy ekonomiczne. Korzyści osiągają nie tylko bezpośredni przedsiębiorcy akademiccy, ale także innowacyjne przedsiębiorstwa, regiony czy kraje oraz same uczelnie. English Abstract: This publication is a collection of "good practices" of academic entrepreneurship identified not only in Poland, but also in the United States, Germany, China, Switzerland, Belgium, Italy, Sweden, Canada and the UK .. The practices come from various sectors of the economy such as: biotechnology, medicine, pharmacy, biopharmaceutics, electronics and automation, semiconductors, nanotechnology, electronics, electromechanics, environmental analysis, IT, internet, multimedia and communication. Examples of "enterprising universities" are also indicated, where we are dealing with the conscious attitude of entire academic communities at development of entrepreneurship in many economic sectors as the basis of own development strategy. Although the presented examples may seem distant, they are connected by the ability to translate knowledge generated in the sphere of science into economic successes. Not only direct academia benefits, but also innovative enterprises, regions or countries and universities themselves.

Suggested Citation

  • Plawgo, Bogusław & Klimczuk-Kochańska, Magdalena & Juchnicka, Marta & Citkowski, Mariusz, 2011. "Przedsiębiorczość akademicka. Dobre praktyki [Academic Entrepreneurship: Good Practices]," MPRA Paper 84988, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:84988
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/84988/1/MPRA_paper_84988.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Kun & Kenney, Martin, 2007. "Universities/Research Institutes and Regional Innovation Systems: The Cases of Beijing and Shenzhen," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 1056-1074, June.
    2. Zhou, Yu, 2008. "Synchronizing Export Orientation with Import Substitution: Creating Competitive Indigenous High-Tech Companies in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 2353-2370, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ten Brink, Tobias & Butollo, Florian, 2018. "A great leap? Domestic market growth and local state support in the upgrading of China's LED lighting industry," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 18(2), pages 285-306.
    2. Kim, Jinhee & Lee, Keun, 2022. "Local–global interface as a key factor in the catching up of regional innovation systems: Fast versus slow catching up among Taipei, Shenzhen, and Penang in Asia," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    3. Chen, Guanghua & Yang, Guoliang & He, Feng & Chen, Kaihua, 2019. "Exploring the effect of political borders on university-industry collaborative research performance: Evidence from China’s Guangdong province," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 82, pages 58-69.
    4. Helena Barnard & Robin Cowan & Moritz Müller, 2016. "On the value of foreign PhDs in the developing world: Training versus selection effects," Working Papers of BETA 2016-04, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    5. Shang, Qingyan & Poon, Jessie P.H. & Yue, Qingtang, 2012. "The role of regional knowledge spillovers on China's innovation," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 1164-1175.
    6. Prud'homme, Dan, 2012. "Dulling the Cutting Edge: How Patent-Related Policies and Practices Hamper Innovation in China," MPRA Paper 43299, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Dec 2012.
    7. Huiwen Gong & Robert Hassink & Cassandra Wang, 2021. "Strategic coupling and regional resilience in times of uncertainty: the industrial chain chief model in Zhejiang, China," PEGIS geo-disc-2021_06, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    8. Sargent, John & Matthews, Linda, 2009. "China versus Mexico in the Global EPZ Industry: Maquiladoras, FDI Quality, and Plant Mortality," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 1069-1082, June.
    9. Zhang, Min & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés, 2024. "Government reform and innovation performance in China," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122728, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Kyungbo Park & Jeonghwa Cha & Jongyi Hong, 2023. "Developing a Framework for Evaluating and Predicting Management Innovation in Public Research Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Juhyun Lee & Sangsung Park & Junseok Lee, 2023. "Exploring Potential R&D Collaboration Partners Using Embedding of Patent Graph," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Monica Plechero & Cristina Chaminade, 2016. "The role of regional sectoral specialisation on the geography of innovation networks: a comparison between firms located in regions in developed and emerging economies," International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(2), pages 148-171.
    13. Yonghua Zou & Wanxia Zhao, 2014. "Anatomy of Tsinghua University Science Park in China: institutional evolution and assessment," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 39(5), pages 663-674, October.
    14. Zheng, Connie, 2014. "The inner circle of technology innovation: A case study of two Chinese firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 140-148.
    15. Daniel Schiller & Henning Kroll, 2013. "The global economic crisis as leverage for emerging regional growth paths? Differentiated evidence from China – three years onwards," Chapters, in: Sören Eriksson (ed.), Clusters and Economic Growth in Asia, chapter 5, pages 85-118, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Lisa Craiut & Constantin Bungau & Tudor Bungau & Cristian Grava & Pavel Otrisal & Andrei-Flavius Radu, 2022. "Technology Transfer, Sustainability, and Development, Worldwide and in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-33, November.
    17. Youtie, Jan & Li, Yin & Rogers, Juan & Shapira, Philip, 2017. "Institutionalization of international university research ventures," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1692-1705.
    18. Jue Wang & Shaoming Cheng & Sukumar Ganapati, 2012. "Path dependence in regional ICT innovation: Differential evolution of Zhongguancun and Bangalore," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(3), pages 231-245, August.
    19. Shuai Liu & Xiao-Yu Xu & Kai Zhao & Li-Ming Xiao & Qi Li, 2021. "Understanding the Complexity of Regional Innovation Capacity Dynamics in China: From the Perspective of Hidden Markov Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    20. Kenney, Martin & Patton, Donald, 2009. "Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the Current University Invention Ownership Model," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 1407-1422, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Academic Entrepreneurship; Startups;

    JEL classification:

    • M13 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - New Firms; Startups

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:84988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.